CAPECattack pattern
CAPEC-244 XSS Targeting URI Placeholders
High
Official page ↗
- Abstraction
- Detailed
- Status
- Draft
- Likelihood of attack
- High
- Typical severity
- High
- CAPEC version
- 3.9
Description
An attack of this type exploits the ability of most browsers to interpret "data", "javascript" or other URI schemes as client-side executable content placeholders. This attack consists of passing a malicious URI in an anchor tag HREF attribute or any other similar attributes in other HTML tags. Such malicious URI contains, for example, a base64 encoded HTML content with an embedded cross-site scripting payload. The attack is executed when the browser interprets the malicious content i.e., for example, when the victim clicks on the malicious link.
Execution flow
1. [Explore] [Survey the application for user-controllable inputs] Using a browser or an automated tool, an adversary follows all public links and actions on a web site. They record all the links, the forms, the resources accessed and all other potential entry-points for the web application.
2. [Experiment] [Probe identified potential entry points for reflected XSS vulnerability] The adversary uses the entry points gathered in the "Explore" phase as a target list and injects various payloads formatted as data URI schemes using base to determine if an entry point actually represents a vulnerability and to characterize the extent to which the vulnerability can be exploited.
3. [Experiment] [Craft malicious XSS URL] Once the adversary has determined which parameters are vulnerable to XSS, they will craft a malicious URL containing the XSS exploit. The adversary can have many goals, from stealing session IDs, cookies, credentials, and page content from the victim.
4. [Exploit] [Get victim to click URL] In order for the attack to be successful, the victim needs to access the malicious URL.
Prerequisites
• Target client software must allow scripting such as JavaScript and allows executable content delivered using a data URI scheme.
Skills required
• [Medium] To inject the malicious payload in a web page
Consequences
• Integrity: Modify Data
• Confidentiality: Read Data
• Authorization: Execute Unauthorized Commands
• Accountability, Authentication, Authorization, Non-Repudiation: Gain Privileges
• Access Control, Authorization: Bypass Protection Mechanism
Mitigations
• Design: Use browser technologies that do not allow client side scripting.
• Design: Utilize strict type, character, and encoding enforcement.
• Implementation: Ensure all content that is delivered to client is sanitized against an acceptable content specification.
• Implementation: Ensure all content coming from the client is using the same encoding; if not, the server-side application must canonicalize the data before applying any filtering.
• Implementation: Perform input validation for all remote content, including remote and user-generated content
• Implementation: Perform output validation for all remote content.
• Implementation: Disable scripting languages such as JavaScript in browser
• Implementation: Patching software. There are many attack vectors for XSS on the client side and the server side. Many vulnerabilities are fixed in service packs for browser, web servers, and plug in technologies, staying current on patch release that deal with XSS countermeasures mitigates this.
Related
Child of · CAPEC (3)
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-83 Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page weakness
Referenced by CWE · attack pattern (1)
- CWE-83 Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page weakness