CAPECattack pattern

CAPEC-32 XSS Through HTTP Query Strings

High Official page ↗
Abstraction
Detailed
Status
Draft
Likelihood of attack
High
Typical severity
High
CAPEC version
3.9

Description

An adversary embeds malicious script code in the parameters of an HTTP query string and convinces a victim to submit the HTTP request that contains the query string to a vulnerable web application. The web application then procedes to use the values parameters without properly validation them first and generates the HTML code that will be executed by the victim's browser.

Execution flow

1. [Explore] [Survey the application for public links] Using a browser or an automated tool, an adversary follows all public links on a web site. They record all the links they find. 2. [Experiment] [Probe public links for XSS vulnerability] The adversary uses the public links gathered in the "Explore" phase as a target list and requests variations on the URLs they spidered before. They send parameters that include variations of payloads. They record all the responses from the server that include unmodified versions of their script. 3. [Experiment] [Craft malicious XSS URL] Once the adversary has determined which parameters are vulnerable to XSS, they will craft a malicious URL containing the XSS exploit. The adversary can have many goals, from stealing session IDs, cookies, credentials, and page content from the victim. 4. [Exploit] [Get victim to click URL] In order for the attack to be successful, the victim needs to access the malicious URL.

Prerequisites

• Target client software must allow scripting such as JavaScript. Server software must allow display of remote generated HTML without sufficient input or output validation.

Skills required

• [Low] To place malicious payload on server via HTTP • [High] Exploiting any information gathered by HTTP Query on script host

Consequences

• Confidentiality: Read Data • Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Commands

Mitigations

• Design: Use browser technologies that do not allow client side scripting. • Design: Utilize strict type, character, and encoding enforcement • Design: Server side developers should not proxy content via XHR or other means, if a http proxy for remote content is setup on the server side, the client's browser has no way of discerning where the data is originating from. • Implementation: Ensure all content that is delivered to client is sanitized against an acceptable content specification. • Implementation: Perform input validation for all remote content, including remote and user-generated content • Implementation: Perform output validation for all remote content. • Implementation: Disable scripting languages such as JavaScript in browser • Implementation: Session tokens for specific host • Implementation: Patching software. There are many attack vectors for XSS on the client side and the server side. Many vulnerabilities are fixed in service packs for browser, web servers, and plug in technologies, staying current on patch release that deal with XSS countermeasures mitigates this. • Implementation: Privileges are constrained, if a script is loaded, ensure system runs in chroot jail or other limited authority mode

Related

Child of · CAPEC (3)

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page weakness

Referenced by CWE · attack pattern (1)

  • CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page weakness