CVEvulnerability
CVE-2022-49963
5.5 MEDIUM
Official page ↗
- Status
- Modified
- Published
- 2025-06-18
- Last modified
- 2026-10-15
- Assigner
- 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
- CVSS 3.1 (416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67)
- 7.8 HIGH — CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- CVSS 3.1 ([email protected])
- 5.5 MEDIUM — CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/ttm: fix CCS handling
Crucible + recent Mesa seems to sometimes hit:
GEM_BUG_ON(num_ccs_blks > NUM_CCS_BLKS_PER_XFER)
And it looks like we can also trigger this with gem_lmem_swapping, if we
modify the test to use slightly larger object sizes.
Looking closer it looks like we have the following issues in
migrate_copy():
- We are using plain integer in various places, which we can easily
overflow with a large object.
- We pass the entire object size (when the src is lmem) into
emit_pte() and then try to copy it, which doesn't work, since we
only have a few fixed sized windows in which to map the pages and
perform the copy. With an object > 8M we therefore aren't properly
copying the pages. And then with an object > 64M we trigger the
GEM_BUG_ON(num_ccs_blks > NUM_CCS_BLKS_PER_XFER).
So it looks like our copy handling for any object > 8M (which is our
CHUNK_SZ) is currently broken on DG2.
Testcase: igt@gem_lmem_swapping
(cherry picked from commit 8676145eb2f53a9940ff70910caf0125bd8a4bc2)
Affected configurations
• linux linux kernel (>= 5.19 < 5.19.8)
• linux linux kernel 6.0