CVEvulnerability

CVE-2026-46560

7.5 HIGH EPSS 0.19% Published 2026-10-30 Modified 2026-10-30 Official page ↗

Exploitation and prioritisation

EPSS
0.19% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days · in the top 91.8% of all CVEs (2026-11-03)
EU Vulnerability Database
EUVD-2026-114320

Affected packages

EcosystemPackageVulnerableFixed inAdvisory
Mavenorg.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius< 16.1.116.1.1GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9
Status
Awaiting Analysis
Published
2026-10-30
Last modified
2026-10-30
Assigner
[email protected]
CVSS 3.1 ([email protected])
7.5 HIGH — CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-347

Description

Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.1.1, the `RADIUS` authentication module opens an unconnected datagram socket and trusts the first UDP datagram received on the client source port. The receive path does not verify the source IP and port, match the response identifier to the outstanding request, or verify the RFC 2865 `Response Authenticator`; the RFC 2869 `Message-Authenticator` is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success. On a deployment with a `RADIUS` module instance enabled on a login chain, an unauthenticated network attacker can race the real server on-path or spray forged `Access-Accept` packets off-path and obtain a session for any `RADIUS`-mapped username without knowing the shared secret. Unlike CVE-2024-3596, exploitation requires no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery because no response authenticator is checked. The resulting session carries the impersonated principal's privileges. This issue is fixed in version 16.1.1.

Related

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature weakness

Referenced by GitHub Advisory · alias (1)

  • GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9 OpenAM: Unauthenticated Authentication Bypass via RADIUS Spoofing advisory · Maven

References