CWEweakness
CWE-105 Struts: Form Field Without Validator
- Abstraction
- Variant
- Structure
- Simple
- Status
- Draft
- Languages
- Java
- CWE version
- 5.0
Description
The product has a form field that is not validated by a corresponding validation form, which can introduce other weaknesses related to insufficient input validation.
Common consequences
• Integrity: Unexpected State — Omitting validation for even a single input field may give attackers the leeway they need to compromise the product. Although J2EE applications are not generally susceptible to memory corruption attacks, if a J2EE application interfaces with native code that does not perform array bounds checking, an attacker may be able to use an input validation mistake in the J2EE application to launch a buffer overflow attack.
• Integrity: Bypass Protection Mechanism — If unused fields are not validated, shared business logic in an action may allow attackers to bypass the validation checks that are performed for other uses of the form.
Potential mitigations
• [Implementation] Validate all form fields. If a field is unused, it is still important to constrain it so that it is empty or undefined.
Detection methods
• Automated Static Analysis: Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)