CWEweakness

CWE-146 Improper Neutralization of Expression/Command Delimiters

Official page ↗
Abstraction
Variant
Structure
Simple
Status
Incomplete
Languages
Not Language-Specific
CWE version
5.0

Description

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as expression or command delimiters when they are sent to a downstream component.

Common consequences

• Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Other: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Alter Execution Logic — As data is parsed, an injected/absent/malformed delimiter may cause the process to take unexpected actions. When delimiters related to expressions or commands are not neutralized, this could lead to code execution.

Potential mitigations

• Developers should anticipate that inter-expression and inter-command delimiters will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system. • [Implementation] Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. • [Implementation] While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88). • [Implementation] Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

Related

Attack pattern · CAPEC (2)

  • CAPEC-15 Command Delimiters attack pattern
  • CAPEC-6 Argument Injection attack pattern

Child of · CWE (1)

  • CWE-140 Improper Neutralization of Delimiters weakness

Referenced by CAPEC · weakness (2)

  • CAPEC-15 Command Delimiters attack pattern
  • CAPEC-6 Argument Injection attack pattern

Referenced by CVE · weakness (10)

  • CVE-2026-20288 A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IMC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with Admin privileges… vulnerability
  • CVE-2026-22266 Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, version(s) prior to 19.22, contain(s) an Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel… vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-53192 ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Neutralization of Expression/Command Delimiters vulnerability in Apache Commons OGNL. vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-20237 A vulnerability in Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software… vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-20329 A vulnerability in the SSH subsystem of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to… vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-20470 A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV340, RV340W, RV345, and RV345P Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers… vulnerability
  • CVE-2023-20117 Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could… vulnerability
  • CVE-2023-20128 Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV320 and RV325 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Routers could… vulnerability
  • CVE-2023-20035 A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands with… vulnerability
  • CVE-2022-4055 When xdg-mail is configured to use thunderbird for mailto URLs, improper parsing of the URL can lead to additional headers being passed to… vulnerability