CWEweakness

CWE-147 Improper Neutralization of Input Terminators

Official page ↗
Abstraction
Variant
Structure
Simple
Status
Draft
Languages
Not Language-Specific
CWE version
5.0

Description

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as input terminators when they are sent to a downstream component.

Common consequences

• Integrity: Unexpected State

Potential mitigations

• Developers should anticipate that terminators will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system. • [Implementation] Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. • [Implementation] While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88). • [Implementation] Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.

Observed examples

• CVE-2000-0319: MFV. mail server does not properly identify terminator string to signify end of message, causing corruption, possibly in conjunction with off-by-one error. • CVE-2000-0320: MFV. mail server does not properly identify terminator string to signify end of message, causing corruption, possibly in conjunction with off-by-one error. • CVE-2001-0996: Mail server does not quote end-of-input terminator if it appears in the middle of a message. • CVE-2002-0001: Improperly terminated comment or phrase allows commands.

Related

Attack pattern · CAPEC (1)

  • CAPEC-460 HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP) attack pattern

Observed example · CVE (4)

  • CVE-2002-0001 Vulnerability in RFC822 address parser in mutt before 1.2.5.1 and mutt 1.3.x before 1.3.25 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary… vulnerability
  • CVE-2001-0996 POP3Lite before 0.2.4 does not properly quote a . vulnerability
  • CVE-2000-0319 mail.local in Sendmail 8.10.x does not properly identify the .\n string which identifies the end of message text, which allows a remote… vulnerability
  • CVE-2000-0320 Qpopper 2.53 and 3.0 does not properly identify the \n string which identifies the end of message text, which allows a remote attacker to… vulnerability

Child of · CWE (1)

  • CWE-138 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements weakness

Referenced by CAPEC · weakness (1)

  • CAPEC-460 HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP) attack pattern

Referenced by CVE · weakness (7)

  • CVE-2026-113602 json-smart through 2.6.0 contains an input validation bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to evade strict-mode trailing-data checks… vulnerability
  • CVE-2026-82989 There is an input injection in vCast exposed network services in ViewSonic ViewBoard that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to… vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-7962 In Jakarta Mail versions prior to 2.0.2 it is possible to perform an SMTP Injection by utilizing the \r and \n UTF-8 characters to separate… vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-50349 Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations… vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-52006 Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations… vulnerability
  • CVE-2024-52505 matrix-appservice-irc is a Node.js IRC bridge for the Matrix messaging protocol. vulnerability
  • CVE-2023-4393 HTML and SMTP injections on the registration page of LiquidFiles versions 3.7.13 and below, allow an attacker to perform more advanced… vulnerability

Referenced by CWE · can also be (1)

  • CWE-170 Improper Null Termination weakness

Referenced by CWE · child of (1)

  • CWE-626 Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte) weakness