CWEweakness
CWE-167 Improper Handling of Additional Special Element
- Abstraction
- Base
- Structure
- Simple
- Status
- Draft
- Languages
- Not Language-Specific
- CWE version
- 5.0
Description
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles when an additional unexpected special element is provided.
Common consequences
• Integrity: Unexpected State
Potential mitigations
• Developers should anticipate that extra special elements will be injected in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.
• [Implementation] Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
• [Implementation] While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
• [Implementation] Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
Observed examples
• CVE-2000-0116: Extra "<" in front of SCRIPT tag bypasses XSS prevention.
• CVE-2001-1157: Extra "<" in front of SCRIPT tag.
• CVE-2002-2086: "<script" - probably a cleansing error
Related
Observed example · CVE (3)
- CVE-2002-2086 Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in magicHTML of SquirrelMail before 1.2.6 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary… vulnerability
- CVE-2001-1157 Baltimore Technologies WEBsweeper 4.0 and 4.02 does not properly filter Javascript from HTML pages, which could allow remote attackers to… vulnerability
- CVE-2000-0116 Firewall-1 does not properly filter script tags, which allows remote attackers to bypass the "Strip Script Tags" restriction by including… vulnerability
Child of · CWE (2)
Referenced by CVE · weakness (5)
- CVE-2025-25006 Improper handling of additional special element in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a… vulnerability
- CVE-2025-30656 An Improper Handling of Additional Special Element vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX… vulnerability
- CVE-2023-4809 In pf packet processing with a 'scrub fragment reassemble' rule, a packet containing multiple IPv6 fragment headers would be reassembled,… vulnerability
- CVE-2023-3580 Improper Handling of Additional Special Element in GitHub repository squidex/squidex prior to 7.4.0. vulnerability
- CVE-2023-0643 Improper Handling of Additional Special Element in GitHub repository squidex/squidex prior to 7.4.0. vulnerability