CWEweakness

CWE-301 Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol

Medium Official page ↗
Abstraction
Base
Structure
Simple
Status
Draft
Likelihood of exploit
Medium
Languages
Not Language-Specific
CWE version
5.0

Description

Simple authentication protocols are subject to reflection attacks if a malicious user can use the target machine to impersonate a trusted user.

Extended description

A mutual authentication protocol requires each party to respond to a random challenge by the other party by encrypting it with a pre-shared key. Often, however, such protocols employ the same pre-shared key for communication with a number of different entities. A malicious user or an attacker can easily compromise this protocol without possessing the correct key by employing a reflection attack on the protocol. Reflection attacks capitalize on mutual authentication schemes in order to trick the target into revealing the secret shared between it and another valid user. In a basic mutual-authentication scheme, a secret is known to both the valid user and the server; this allows them to authenticate. In order that they may verify this shared secret without sending it plainly over the wire, they utilize a Diffie-Hellman-style scheme in which they each pick a value, then request the hash of that value as keyed by the shared secret. In a reflection attack, the attacker claims to be a valid user and requests the hash of a random value from the server. When the server returns this value and requests its own value to be hashed, the attacker opens another connection to the server. This time, the hash requested by the attacker is the value which the server requested in the first connection. When the server returns this hashed value, it is used in the first connection, authenticating the attacker successfully as the impersonated valid user.

Common consequences

• Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity — The primary result of reflection attacks is successful authentication with a target machine -- as an impersonated user.

Potential mitigations

• [Architecture and Design] Use different keys for the initiator and responder or of a different type of challenge for the initiator and responder. • [Architecture and Design] Let the initiator prove its identity before proceeding.

Observed examples

• CVE-2024-11022: web server includes the nonce in its challenge/response mechanism, allowing a replay attack • CVE-2005-3435: product authentication succeeds if user-provided MD5 hash matches the hash in its database; this can be subjected to replay attacks.

Related

Attack pattern · CAPEC (1)

  • CAPEC-90 Reflection Attack in Authentication Protocol attack pattern

Observed example · CVE (2)

  • CVE-2024-11022 The authentication process to the web server uses a challenge response procedure which inludes the nonce and additional information. vulnerability
  • CVE-2005-3435 admin_news.php in Archilles Newsworld up to 1.3.0 allows attackers to bypass authentication by obtaining the password hash for another… vulnerability

Child of · CWE (1)

Peer of · CWE (1)

  • CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm weakness

Referenced by CAPEC · weakness (1)

  • CAPEC-90 Reflection Attack in Authentication Protocol attack pattern

Referenced by CVE · weakness (1)

  • CVE-2019-9497 The implementations of EAP-PWD in hostapd EAP Server and wpa_supplicant EAP Peer do not validate the scalar and element values in… vulnerability

Referenced by CWE · has member (1)