GitHub Advisoryadvisory · SwiftURL

GHSA-39g5-644c-qwcg container: pf Rule Injection via Domain Name Argument in `container system dns create --localhost` Command

LOW Published 2026-05-07 Modified 2026-05-07 Official page ↗
Ecosystem
SwiftURL
Packages
github.com/apple/container
Severity
Low
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weaknesses
CWE-20
Reviewed
2026-05-07

Affected packages

• SwiftURL github.com/apple/container: < 0.12.3 → fixed in 0.12.3

Description

Product Name: container Github Link: https://github.com/apple/container Version: `: exactly one rule is written to the pf anchor file: ``` rdr inet from any to -> 127.0.0.1 # ``` The redirect destination is hard-coded to `127.0.0.1`. The rule type is always `rdr inet`. There is no legitimate way to produce a rule that redirects traffic to any IP other than `127.0.0.1`, nor to produce `pass`, `block`, or `nat` rules, through normal command usage. What injection additionally enables The injection lives in the domain name argument. `--localhost` must be supplied to trigger the `createRedirectRule()` code path — without it, no pf rule is written at all and the domain name never reaches the pf anchor file. However, the value passed to `--localhost` is unconstrained (only IP format is validated), so any valid IP suffices to open the injection path. ```bash sudo container system dns create --localhost 127.0.0.1 \ $'foo.local\nrdr inet from any to 1.2.3.4 -> 5.6.7.8' ``` The `--localhost` value becomes the `from` IP in the legitimate rule. The injected content after the newline is an entirely independent pf directive with fully attacker-controlled `from` and `to` values. The capability gap between normal use and injection is therefore: | | Normal use (no `--localhost`) | Normal use (with `--localhost`) | Injection (with `--localhost`, domain contains `\n`) | |---|---|---|---| | Writes pf rule | No | Yes | Yes | | `from` IP | — | User-specified | Arbitrary | | `to` IP | — | Hard-coded `127.0.0.1` | Arbitrary | | Rule type | — | `rdr inet` only | Any (`pass`, `block`, `nat`, …) | The single capability that injection uniquely adds is: writing a pf rule with an arbitrary `to` IP — redirecting traffic to any external host rather than being confined to `127.0.0.1`. Primary scenario: sudo delegation bypass** The most direct attack path requires only that an administrator grants a restricted user sudo access to this specific command: ``` /etc/sudoers user ALL=(root) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/container system dns create * ``` The administrator's intent is to allow `user` to manage DNS domains for container networking. Under normal usage this is bounded: even with `--localhost`, the command can only produce `rdr ... -> 127.0.0.1` rules. Without `--localhost`, it produces no pf rules at all. With the injection, the user provides any valid IP to `--localhost` to open the pf write path, then embeds the actual malicious rule in the domain name: ```bash sudo container system dns create --localhost 127.0.0.1 \ $'evil.local\nrdr inet proto tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 -> 203.0.113.1 port 4444' ``` This is a classic sudo delegation bypass: the administrator delegated a scoped capability; the injection expands it to writing arbitrary kernel firewall rules. Additional scenarios: • An automated script or CI/CD pipeline that runs `sudo container system dns create $DOMAIN_FROM_ENV` where the environment variable originates from a container label, image metadata, or external API response — any newline in the upstream value triggers injection without any user action • A developer following documentation or a README that includes a crafted domain name example (social engineering) Consequences of successful injection: • pf redirect rules with arbitrary `from` and `to` IPs — enabling redirection of any host-level traffic to an attacker-controlled external address (not achievable through normal command use) • Additional rule types (`pass`, `block`, `nat`) with arbitrary port and protocol filters loaded into the kernel • Legitimate traffic selectively blocked (denial of service against specific endpoints) • Injected rules persist across DNS domain deletions — the `removeRedirectRule()` cleanup path cannot match and remove standalone injected lines Credit This vulnerability was independently discovered and reported by multiple sources: • XlabAI Team of Tencent Xuanwu Lab • Atuin Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine • Mohamed Abdelaal (@0xmrma)

Related

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation weakness

References