GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go
GHSA-3p65-76g6-3w7r Distribution affected by pull-through cache credential exfiltration via www-authenticate bearer realm
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-33540
- Ecosystem
- Go
- Packages
- github.com/distribution/distribution/v3, github.com/distribution/distribution
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-918
- Reviewed
- 2026-04-06
Affected packages
• Go github.com/distribution/distribution/v3: < 3.1.0 → fixed in 3.1.0
• Go github.com/distribution/distribution: <= 2.8.3 (no fix yet)
Description
hi guys,
commit: 40594bd98e6d6ed993b5c6021c93fdf96d2e5851 (as-of 2026-01-31)
contact: GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/distribution/distribution/security/advisories/new)
summary
in pull-through cache mode, distribution discovers token auth endpoints by parsing `WWW-Authenticate` challenges returned by the configured upstream registry. the `realm` URL from a bearer challenge is used without validating that it matches the upstream registry host. as a result, an attacker-controlled upstream (or an attacker with MitM position to the upstream) can cause distribution to send the configured upstream credentials via basic auth to an attacker-controlled `realm` URL.
this is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2020-15157 (containerd), but in distribution’s pull-through cache proxy auth flow.
severity
HIGH
note: the baseline impact is credential disclosure of the configured upstream credentials. if a deployment uses broader credentials for upstream auth (for example cloud iam credentials), the downstream impact can be higher; i am not claiming this as default for all deployments.
impact
credential exfiltration of the upstream authentication material configured for the pull-through cache.
attacker starting positions that make this realistic:
• supply chain / configuration: an operator configures a proxy cache to use an upstream that becomes attacker-controlled (compromised registry, stale domain, or a malicious mirror)
• network: MitM on the upstream connection in environments where the upstream is reachable over insecure transport or a compromised network path
affected components
• `registry/proxy/proxyauth.go:66-81` (`getAuthURLs`): extracts bearer `realm` from upstream `WWW-Authenticate` without validating destination
• `internal/client/auth/session.go:485-510` (`fetchToken`): uses the realm URL directly for token fetch
• `internal/client/auth/session.go:429-434` (`fetchTokenWithBasicAuth`): sends credentials via basic auth to the realm URL
reproduction
attachment: `poc.zip` (local harness) with canonical and control runs.
the harness is local and does not contact a real registry: it uses two local HTTP servers (upstream + attacker token service) to demonstrate whether basic auth is sent to an attacker-chosen realm.
```bash
unzip -q -o poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make canonical
make control
```
expected output (excerpt):
```
[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth
[PROOF_MARKER]: basic_auth_sent=true realm_host=127.0.0.1 account_param=user authorization_prefix=Basic
```
control output (excerpt):
```
[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth
[NC_MARKER]: realm_validation=PASS basic_auth_sent=false
```
suggested remediation
validate that the token `realm` destination is within the intended trust boundary before associating credentials with it or sending any authentication to it. one conservative option is strict same-host binding: only accept a realm whose host matches the configured upstream host.
fix accepted when
• distribution does not send configured upstream credentials to an attacker-chosen realm URL
• a regression test covers the canonical and blocked cases
addendum.md
poc.zip
PR_DESCRIPTION.md
RUNNABLE_POC.md
best,
oleh
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-33540 Distribution is a toolkit to pack, ship, store, and deliver container content. vulnerability
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery weakness