GitHub Advisoryadvisory · PyPI
GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j pydantic-settings: NestedSecretsSettingsSource follows symlinks outside secrets_dir, enabling local file read and bypassing secrets_dir_max_size
MEDIUM
Official page ↗
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Packages
- pydantic-settings
- Severity
- Moderate
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses
- CWE-22, CWE-400, CWE-59
- Reviewed
- 2026-06-19
Affected packages
• PyPI pydantic-settings: >= 2.12.0, < 2.14.2 → fixed in 2.14.2
Description
Summary
`NestedSecretsSettingsSource` reads secret values from files in a configured `secrets_dir`. When `secrets_nested_subdir=True`, a directory entry inside `secrets_dir` that is a symbolic link pointing outside `secrets_dir` is followed, so files outside the configured directory are read into settings values. The same code path bypasses the documented `secrets_dir_max_size` protection. An attacker or lower-privileged component able to influence entries in the configured secrets directory (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount) can turn this into an unintended local file read into settings and can defeat the advertised loading-size cap. This report does not claim network reachability by itself.
Details
`NestedSecretsSettingsSource` performed two passes over `secrets_dir` using two different, inconsistent directory-traversal implementations:
• The size check in `validate_secrets_path()` used `Path.glob('**/*')`, which does not descend into a symbolically-linked directory.
• The loader in `load_secrets()` used `glob.iglob(f'{path}/**/*', recursive=True)` followed by `read_text()`, which does follow symlinked directories and reads through the link target.
Because the two passes disagreed on symlinks, a symlinked directory inside `secrets_dir` whose target lives elsewhere was invisible to the size accounting (counted as 0 bytes) while still being fully read by the loader. This produces two distinct problems:
1. Out-of-tree read (CWE-22 / CWE-59). A symlinked directory (or file) inside `secrets_dir` that resolves outside it is followed, and the external file's contents are loaded into the corresponding settings field.
2. `secrets_dir_max_size` bypass (CWE-400). The size check never sees the out-of-tree content, so the documented size cap is neither respected nor able to reject the oversized external file. A related amplification exists for cyclic in-tree symlinks, which `glob.iglob(recursive=True)` re-traverses, inflating the size accounting and the number of loaded secrets.
Reproduction
In a clean Linux container, with a `secrets_dir` containing a symlink `secrets/db -> /path/outside` and an `outside/passwd` file of 512 bytes, while `secrets_dir_max_size=100`:
```python
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_settings import (
BaseSettings,
SettingsConfigDict,
NestedSecretsSettingsSource,
)
class Db(BaseModel):
passwd: str | None = None
class Settings(BaseSettings):
model_config = SettingsConfigDict(
secrets_dir='secrets',
secrets_nested_subdir=True,
secrets_dir_max_size=100, # outside/passwd is 512 bytes
)
db: Db = Db()
@classmethod
def settings_customise_sources(
cls, settings_cls, init_settings, env_settings, dotenv_settings, file_secret_settings
):
return (NestedSecretsSettingsSource(file_secret_settings),)
```
On affected versions, `Settings().db.passwd` is populated with the 512-byte out-of-tree file and no `SettingsError` is raised, even though the file exceeds `secrets_dir_max_size`.
Impact
Applications that opt into `NestedSecretsSettingsSource` with `secrets_nested_subdir=True` and load secrets from a directory whose entries can be influenced by an attacker or a lower-privileged component (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount, or a secrets directory partially populated from untrusted input) are affected. The impact is:
• Confidentiality: files outside the configured `secrets_dir` can be read into settings values (local file read).
• Integrity / availability of the safeguard: the advertised `secrets_dir_max_size` cap can be bypassed, and cyclic symlinks can inflate resource usage during loading.
The vulnerability requires the ability to place a symbolic link inside the configured secrets directory; it is not remotely reachable on its own. Applications that do not use `NestedSecretsSettingsSource`, or that point `secrets_dir` at a directory fully under the application's control, are not affected.
Mitigation
Upgrade to pydantic-settings 2.14.2, which:
• walks the secrets directory explicitly and only descends into directories whose resolved path stays within `secrets_dir`, so symlinked directories pointing outside are never followed;
• uses a single, cycle-safe iterator for both the size check and the loader, so the size accounting and the loaded set are always consistent and each real directory is visited at most once;
• skips any file whose resolved path escapes `secrets_dir`, as defense in depth.
If upgrading is not immediately possible, ensure the configured `secrets_dir` is fully owned and controlled by the application (no writable or attacker-influenced entries), or avoid `secrets_nested_subdir=True`.