GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-88f6-4rjv-x774 Vikunja: TOTP secret is readable after enrollment, no step-up auth

MEDIUM Published 2026-10-09 Modified 2026-10-09 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-91982
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
code.vikunja.io/api
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weaknesses
CWE-312, CWE-522
Reviewed
2026-10-09

Affected packages

• Go code.vikunja.io/api: < 2.6.0 → fixed in 2.6.0

Description

Summary Once a user has TOTP enabled, the API still hands back the raw shared secret to anyone holding that account's access token. Reading it doesn't ask for the password, even though disabling TOTP does. So a stolen token, an XSS, or a browser left open is enough to copy the second factor into your own authenticator and keep generating valid codes indefinitely. Details `GET /api/v1/user/settings/totp` returns the full TOTP object, including the secret field and the otpauth:// provisioning URL. `GET /api/v1/user/settings/totp/qrcode` renders the same secret as a QR image. Neither requires re-authentication, the access token alone is enough. This is inconsistent with the rest of the flow: `POST /api/v1/user/settings/totp/disable` calls CheckUserPassword before it will turn TOTP off. So the destructive action is gated behind the password, but reading out the secret that backs the second factor isn't. There's also no reason for the secret to be readable at all once enrollment is finished, the client only needs it during setup. The fix is to stop returning secret/url/the QR code once enabled is true (only expose them during the enrollment window). Requiring the password on the read, like disable already does, would also be reasonable. PoC The attacker needs the victim's access token, from an XSS, a leaked/stolen token, or an unlocked session. TOTP must already be enabled on the account. 1. With the victim's bearer token, call: ``` GET /api/v1/user/settings/totp Authorization: Bearer ``` The response contains the shared secret and the otpauth:// URL: ``` {"secret": "", "enabled": true, "url": "otpauth://totp/..."} ``` 2. Paste that secret (or scan `/api/v1/user/settings/totp/qrcode`) into any authenticator app. 3. It now produces the same 6-digit codes as the victim's device. Nothing is logged and the victim gets no notification. Impact This defeats the purpose of the second factor. 2FA is supposed to survive exactly this situation, a compromised password or a hijacked session, but a single read of the account's own settings hands over the shared secret with no step-up check and no trace. Combined with a known or later-recovered password, it's a durable account takeover that TOTP was meant to prevent.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-91982 Vikunja before 2.6.0 continues to expose the raw TOTP shared secret after enrollment through the GET /api/v1/user/settings/totp and… vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (2)

  • CWE-312 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information weakness
  • CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials weakness

References