GHSA-8p33-q827-ghj5 dssrf: every IPv6 category bypasses is_url_safe

• npm dssrf: < 1.0.3 → fixed in 1.0.3

A vulnerability on dssrf allow, an attacker to use, one of them following ipv6 ```rust Input Category http://[::1]/ IPv6 loopback http://[fc00::1]/ IPv6 ULA http://[fe80::1]/ IPv6 link-local http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/ IPv4-mapped loopback http://[::ffff:169.254.169.254]/ IPv4-mapped IMDS http://[::ffff:100.64.0.1]/ IPv4-mapped CGNAT http://[64:ff9b::7f00:1]/ NAT64 well-known prefix http://[64:ff9b:1::1]/ NAT64 local-use (RFC 8215) http://[5f00::1]/ SRv6 SID (RFC 9602) http://[3fff::1]/ IPv6 documentation (RFC 9637) http://[fec0::1]/ IPv6 site-local (deprecated, RFC 3879) http://[::127.0.0.1]/ IPv4-compatible IPv6 ``` one of those to bypass dssrf and the attacker get SSRF, we claim that ipv6 disabled entirely that is wrong on our documentation POC ```bash mkdir dssrf-poc && cd dssrf-poc npm init -y >/dev/null npm install dssrf@^1.0.2 cat > audit.js { for (const [url, label] of cases) { const safe = await dssrf.is_url_safe(url); console.log(`${safe ? '✓ALLOW' : '·block'} ${url.padEnd(40)} ${label}`); } })(); EOF node audit.js ``` Credit Million Thank's to for reporting that responsibly. Update Users need to update from now to dssrf 1.0.3 Lessons Learned AS we see in the past and today, a lot of advisories or cves bypasses uses IPv6, and IPv6 is the weakest link to be configured correctly and rarely properly tested, Since we blocked ipv4, our ipv6 blocking logic completly broken and never works