GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go
GHSA-8p9h-49rc-qgxj Gitea: Repository Visibility Manipulation via Git Push Options
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-58437
- Ecosystem
- Go
- Packages
- code.gitea.io/gitea
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-284
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-21
Affected packages
• Go code.gitea.io/gitea: < 1.27.0 → fixed in 1.27.0
Description
Repository Visibility Manipulation via Git Push Options
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Affected File | `routers/private/hook_post_receive.go` |
| Affected Function | `HookPostReceive()` |
| Affected Lines | 173–225 |
| Prerequisite | Attacker must have owner-level or admin collaborator access to the target repository |
---
Description
Gitea's post-receive git hook handler processes git push options — key-value pairs transmitted by a client during `git push` using the `-o` flag. Two undocumented push options, `repo.private` and `repo.template`, allow any user with repository owner or admin-collaborator access to toggle the visibility (`private/public`) and template status of a repository as a side effect of a normal git push.
This capability was originally intended solely for the "push-to-create" feature (automatically creating a repo on first push). However, the options are processed without restriction on already-existing repositories, and — critically — the visibility change bypasses every control that a proper settings change would trigger:
• No entry written to the repository's audit/activity log
• No webhook event fired (`repository` event with `visibility_changed` action)
• No org-level notification to owners
• No team permission re-calculation
• No email alert to watchers
• The database update uses `UpdateRepositoryColsNoAutoTime`, which also suppresses the `updated_at` timestamp change
---
Vulnerable Code
`routers/private/hook_post_receive.go:173–225`
```go
isPrivate := opts.GitPushOptions.Bool(private.GitPushOptionRepoPrivate) // "repo.private"
isTemplate := opts.GitPushOptions.Bool(private.GitPushOptionRepoTemplate) // "repo.template"
if isPrivate.Has() || isTemplate.Has() {
// ... loads repo and verifies pusher is owner or admin ...
if !perm.IsOwner() && !perm.IsAdmin() {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, ...)
return
}
// FIXME: these options are not quite right, for example: changing visibility
// should do more works than just setting the is_private flag
// These options should only be used for "push-to-create"
if isPrivate.Has() && repo.IsPrivate != isPrivate.Value() {
// TODO: it needs to do more work
repo.IsPrivate = isPrivate.Value()
repo_model.UpdateRepositoryColsNoAutoTime(ctx, repo, "is_private")
// ^^^ bypasses updated_at timestamp, audit trail suppressed
}
if isTemplate.Has() && repo.IsTemplate != isTemplate.Value() {
repo.IsTemplate = isTemplate.Value()
repo_model.UpdateRepositoryColsNoAutoTime(ctx, repo, "is_template")
}
}
```
The push option constants are defined in `modules/private/pushoptions.go:18–19`:
```go
GitPushOptionRepoPrivate = "repo.private"
GitPushOptionRepoTemplate = "repo.template"
```
---
Attack Scenario
Scenario A — Insider threat / rogue admin collaborator
An organization grants a contractor repo admin access to contribute to a private repository containing proprietary source code. The contractor, before their access is revoked, makes a private repo public for several minutes — long enough to clone, archive, or index the content — then makes it private again. The action leaves no audit trail distinguishable from a normal git push.
Scenario B — Supply-chain template poisoning
A repository marked as a template is used by CI/CD pipelines to generate new project repositories. An admin collaborator uses `repo.template=false` to silently remove the template designation, then makes changes to the repo's content, re-marks it as a template with `repo.template=true`, and waits for downstream consumers to regenerate projects from the now-backdoored template. The `updated_at` timestamp is unchanged due to `UpdateRepositoryColsNoAutoTime`, making diff-detection harder.
---
Step-by-Step Reproduction
Prerequisites:
• A Gitea user account with either owner or admin-collaborator access to a private repository
• `git` client with push access to the repository
---
Step 1 — Confirm the target repository is private
---
Step 2 — Clone the repository
```bash
git clone http://USER:PASSWORD@/OWNER/REPO.git /tmp/target-repo
cd /tmp/target-repo
```
---
Step 3 — Make any commit *(the push option rides on a real push)*
```bash
echo "$(date)" >> .gitkeep
git add .gitkeep
git commit -m "routine update"
```
---
Step 4 — Execute the exploit push
```bash
Make the repository public
git push http://USER:PASSWORD@/OWNER/REPO.git main \
-o repo.private=false
The push completes with a normal success message:
remote: Processed 1 references in total
To http:///OWNER/REPO.git
abc1234..def5678 main -> main
```
---
Step 5 — Verify the repository is now public
---
Step 6 — Restore and cover tracks
Re-make it private in the same session, leaving no visible audit trail
The repository activity feed shows only two normal push events. The visibility change is invisible.
Verification: confirm no activity log entry
---
Impact Details
| Impact | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Data exfiltration | Private source code, CI/CD secrets in plain-text files, environment configs become publicly cloneable for the window the repo is public |
| No audit trail | `UpdateRepositoryColsNoAutoTime` suppresses the `updated_at` change; no activity log entry; no webhook; no notification |
| Supply chain | Combined with `repo.template=true/false`, an attacker can silently rotate repository template status, affecting all downstream repositories that generate from this template |
| Scope | Affects all repos where the attacker has admin-collaborator access — not only repos they own |
---
Recommended Fix
Option 1 (preferred) — Remove the options from post-receive hook entirely. The `repo.private` and `repo.template` push options were designed for the push-to-create flow and have no legitimate use on existing repositories. They should be gated with:
```go
// routers/private/hook_post_receive.go
if isPrivate.Has() || isTemplate.Has() {
if !wasEmpty {
// repo already existed — refuse these options on established repos
log.Warn("Repo push options repo.private/repo.template ignored for existing repo %s", repoName)
// do not process
} else {
// original push-to-create path only
...
}
}
```
Option 2 — Route through the full visibility-change service so that audit events, webhooks, and team re-syncs are triggered:
```go
// Instead of the raw UpdateRepositoryColsNoAutoTime call:
if err := repo_service.UpdateRepositoryVisibility(ctx, repo, isPrivate.Value()); err != nil {
...
}
```
Where `UpdateRepositoryVisibility` fires the `repository` webhook event and writes an activity log entry.
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-58437 Repository Visibility Manipulation via Git Push Options vulnerability
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control weakness