GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-8rc9-vxjh-qjf2 Vega's validators able to submit duplicate transactions

MEDIUM Published 2023-06-20 Modified 2023-06-26 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2023-35163
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
code.vegaprotocol.io/vega
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weaknesses
CWE-20
Reviewed
2023-06-20

Affected packages

• Go code.vegaprotocol.io/vega: < 0.71.6 → fixed in 0.71.6

Description

A vulnerability exists that allows a malicious validator to trick the Vega network into re-processing past Ethereum events from Vega’s Ethereum bridge. For example, a deposit to the collateral bridge for 100USDT that credits a party’s general account on Vega, can be re-processed 50 times resulting in 5000USDT in that party’s general account. This is without depositing any more than the original 100USDT on the bridge. Despite this exploit requiring access to a validator's Vega key, a validator key can be obtained at the small cost of 3000VEGA, the amount needed to announce a new node onto the network. The steps to carry out this exploit are as follows: 1. Cause an Ethereum event on one of the bridge contracts e.g a deposit to the collateral bridge, or the staking bridge 2. This will result in the Ethereum-event-forwarder of each node to submit a ChainEvent transaction to the Vega network corresponding to that event 3. Scrape the valid chain event transaction from the Tendermint block data using a node’s Tendermint API 4. Change the value of the `txId` field of the ChainEvent to any valid, but different, value 5. Bundle the tweaked ChainEvent into a new transaction, sign it with a validator key and resubmit to the Vega network 6. The fraudulent ChainEvent will be processed by Vega as if it were a new ChainEvent even though it did not occur on Ethereum The key to this exploit is in step 4. The `txId` field of the ChainEvent is used when checking for ChainEvent resubmission, but NOT during the subsequent on-chain verification of the event. Therefore changing the `txId` of an existing ChainEvent is enough to by-pass the duplication check and for it to still be verified as a real event. Impact The impact of this exploit is dependent on the ChainEvent being manipulated. The below table describes each one: | Chain Event | Allows | Consequence | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Deposit | Generation of unlimited funds of any asset | Withdrawal of all assets | | Stake Deposit | Delegate unlimited Vega to a single node | A single node has controlling amount of voting power | | Stake Removed | Force a Validator node to drop below self-stake requirements | Prevents reward payouts | | Bridge Stop | The Vega network to think the bridge is stopped | Prevent anyone from withdrawing funds | | Signer Removed | The Vega network to think a validator nodes is not on the multisig contract | Prevent reward payouts | Patches v0.71.6 Workarounds No work around known, however there are mitigations in place should this vulnerability be exploited: • there are monitoring alerts, for `mainnet1`, in place to identify any issues of this nature including this vulnerability being exploited • the validators have the ability to stop the bridge thus stopping any withdrawals should this vulnerability be exploited References N/A

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2023-35163 Vega is a decentralized trading platform that allows pseudo-anonymous trading of derivatives on a blockchain. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation weakness

References