GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm

GHSA-c7q8-3ch8-vqpv xmldom: Processing Instruction Target Injection Bypasses requireWellFormed

HIGH Published 2026-09-08 Modified 2026-09-08 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-83616
Ecosystem
npm
Packages
@xmldom/xmldom, xmldom
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weaknesses
CWE-91
Reviewed
2026-09-08

Affected packages

• npm @xmldom/xmldom: >= 0.7.0, < 0.8.15 → fixed in 0.8.15 • npm @xmldom/xmldom: >= 0.9.0, < 0.9.12 → fixed in 0.9.12 • npm xmldom: <= 0.6.0 (no fix yet)

Description

Summary `Document.createProcessingInstruction()` in `@xmldom/xmldom` performs no validation on the `target` parameter. The `requireWellFormed: true` serializer option validates only for `:` in the target and a case-insensitive `xml` prefix, but does not check for `>` characters. A `>` in the target breaks the processing instruction boundary (``), allowing injection of arbitrary content into the serialized XML output. Details `Document.createProcessingInstruction(target, data)` at `lib/dom.js` around line 2413 accepts any string as the `target` parameter and stores it on the PI node without validation. During serialization, the `requireWellFormed` code path (around line 3286) performs two checks on PI targets: 1. Rejects targets containing `:` (namespace prefix check) 2. Rejects targets matching `xml` case-insensitively (reserved prefix) However, it does NOT validate that the target conforms to the XML Name production, and critically does NOT check for `>` characters. Since processing instructions are serialized as ``, a `>` in the target prematurely closes the PI, causing the remaining content to be interpreted as document content by any downstream XML parser. Root Cause 1. `createProcessingInstruction()` performs no validation on `target` 2. The serializer's `requireWellFormed` check is incomplete -- it only checks for `:` and `xml`, missing characters that break PI syntax (`>`, `?`, whitespace) 3. The serializer emits the target verbatim: `` Proof of Concept ```javascript const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const impl = new DOMImplementation(); const serializer = new XMLSerializer(); const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null); // PI target containing > breaks the PI boundary const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('a>', 'data'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi); const output = serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); console.log(output); // Output: data?> // // The > in the target closes the PI prematurely. // A downstream XML parser sees: // - Processing instruction: (target "a", no data) // - Text content: " data?>" // // requireWellFormed: true did NOT prevent the injection. ``` Injecting elements via PI target ```javascript const pi2 = doc.createProcessingInstruction( 'a?>alert(1)alert(1) // // The injected element is valid XHTML that a browser would execute. ``` Impact Applications that create processing instructions with user-controlled target strings and serialize the result are vulnerable to XML injection. This enables: • XML structure injection: Breaking the PI boundary to inject arbitrary elements, text, or additional processing instructions into the output • XSS via XHTML: If the serialized output is served as XHTML or processed by a browser-based XML parser, injected script elements will execute • XXE chain: Injected DOCTYPE declarations or entity references could trigger XXE in downstream XML parsers that consume the output • requireWellFormed bypass: The existing well-formedness checks are incomplete and provide a false sense of security Fix Applied Under `requireWellFormed`, the serializer validates a processing-instruction target as an XML `NCName` (a `Name` with no colon) and rejects a case-insensitive `xml`, throwing `InvalidStateError` when the target is ill-formed — so a `>`, `?`, or whitespace in the target is now refused.\ On 0.9.12 this replaces an earlier check that already rejected a colon or `xml`, so the no-colon rule is preserved.\ 0.8.15 had no processing-instruction target check at all, so the whole target validation is new there.\ Non-breaking and opt-in. See the XML `Name` production. > ⚠ Opt-in required. Protection is not automatic. Existing serialization calls remain > vulnerable unless `{ requireWellFormed: true }` is explicitly passed. Applications that > serialize untrusted DOM content should audit all `serializeToString()` call sites and add it. Proof of Concept - fixed path ```javascript const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const impl = new DOMImplementation(); const serializer = new XMLSerializer(); const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null); // PI target containing > breaks the PI boundary const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('a>', 'data'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi); // Default path: emits the ill-formed target verbatim. console.log(serializer.serializeToString(doc)); // Output: data?> // Opt-in path: the target check now rejects the break-out character. try { serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); } catch (e) { console.log(e.name); // InvalidStateError } ``` Why the default stays verbatim W3C DOM Parsing's require-well-formed flag defaults to false, and the browser `XMLSerializer` emits the target verbatim in that default mode. Unconditionally throwing on an ill-formed PI target would diverge from that platform behavior and would be an unjustified breaking change, so the stricter validation is gated behind `{ requireWellFormed: true }`. (See the W3C XML Name production and XML Processing Instructions.) Residual limitation The default serialization path still emits the ill-formed target verbatim -- only the opt-in `requireWellFormed` path is protected. Creation-time validation of the `target` in `createProcessingInstruction()` is breaking and is deferred to the next breaking release, tracked at xmldom/xmldom#1073.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-83616 xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-91 XML Injection weakness

References