GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm
GHSA-cr22-wjx7-2w6m MCP Server Kubernetes: Tool Access Control Bypass via Presentation-Layer Filtering Without Execution-Layer Enforcement
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-46519
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Packages
- mcp-server-kubernetes
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses
- CWE-863
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-21
Affected packages
• npm mcp-server-kubernetes: < 3.6.0 → fixed in 3.6.0
Description
Summary
`mcp-server-kubernetes` exposes three environment variables (`ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS`, `ALLOWED_TOOLS`) documented as access controls for restricting which Kubernetes operations are available. These controls are enforced at the tool discovery layer (`tools/list`) but not at the execution layer (`tools/call`). Any client that knows a tool name can invoke it directly regardless of the configured restriction mode. The access control was effectively cosmetic.
Fixed in v3.6.0.
Impact
An attacker or misconfigured AI agent with network access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint could invoke any Kubernetes tool regardless of the restriction mode configured by the operator -- including `kubectl_delete`, `exec_in_pod`, `kubectl_generic`, and `node_management`.
The project explicitly supports and documents multi-client HTTP deployment scenarios (Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, in-cluster deployments, Codex CLI and Gemini CLI integrations). In these deployments, operators relied on the tool restriction env vars to enforce least-privilege access across users or roles. The bypass invalidated that model entirely.
Severity scales with the Kubernetes service account's permissions. In environments where the MCP server runs with `cluster-admin` (common in dev/staging), this is equivalent to full cluster compromise for any client that can reach the endpoint.
The `MCP_AUTH_TOKEN` / `X-MCP-AUTH` mechanism controls who can reach the endpoint but provides no per-tool authorization. An authenticated client restricted to `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get` could still invoke `kubectl_delete` after authentication.
Root Cause
In `src/index.ts`, the `ListToolsRequestSchema` handler applied the configured filtering logic before returning available tools. The `CallToolRequestSchema` handler dispatched directly by tool name with no equivalent check -- every tool was reachable unconditionally.
Proof of Concept
Tested across all three restriction modes against a live kind cluster. In each case, `kubectl_delete` was absent from `tools/list` but executed successfully via a direct `tools/call` request:
```shell
curl -s http://:3003/mcp \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"kubectl_delete","arguments":{"resourceType":"pod","name":"test-pod","namespace":"default"}}}'
```
Result: `{"result":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"pod \"test-pod\" deleted\n"}]}}`
Confirmed across `ALLOW_ONLY_READONLY_TOOLS=true`, `ALLOW_ONLY_NON_DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS=true`, and `ALLOWED_TOOLS=kubectl_get`.
Remediation
The fix applies the same filtering logic from `ListToolsRequestSchema` at the start of the `CallToolRequestSchema` handler, returning an error for any tool call outside the active allowed set. Fixed in v3.6.0.
Credit
Discovered by Francisco Rosales of Manifold Security, coordinated by Ax Sharma, Head of Research at Manifold Security.
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-46519 mcp-server-kubernetes is a Model Context Protocol server for Kubernetes cluster management. vulnerability
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization weakness