GitHub Advisoryadvisory · PyPI, npm

GHSA-f65r-h4g3-3h9h Backpropagate: backprop ui --auth and backprop ui --share do not enforce authentication

CRITICAL Published 2026-06-26 Modified 2026-10-27 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-48797
Ecosystem
PyPI, npm
Packages
backpropagate, @mcptoolshop/backpropagate
Severity
Critical
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weaknesses
CWE-1295, CWE-358, CWE-862
Reviewed
2026-06-26

Affected packages

• PyPI backpropagate: >= 1.1.0, < 1.2.0 → fixed in 1.2.0 • npm @mcptoolshop/backpropagate: >= 1.1.0, < 1.2.0 → fixed in 1.2.0

Description

Summary In `backpropagate >= 1.1.0`, the optional Reflex web UI (`pip install backpropagate[ui]`, launched via `backprop ui`) exposes a training control plane: dataset upload, model load, training start/stop, multi-run orchestration, GGUF export, and HuggingFace Hub push. The CLI accepts two operator-facing flags intended as security controls: • `--auth user:pass` — documented as "require HTTP Basic authentication on every request to the UI." • `--share` — documented as "expose the UI on a public address; requires `--auth`." When `--auth user:pass` is passed, the CLI prints `Auth: enabled (user: )` to confirm to the operator that authentication is active, then exports `BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH=user:pass` to the subprocess that launches the Reflex backend. The Reflex backend (`backpropagate/ui_app/`) never reads `BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH`.** No authentication middleware is registered. No request-level guard runs. No WebSocket upgrade guard runs. Any client that reaches the bound port — local or remote, depending on whether `--share` is used — has full UI access. An inline comment at `backpropagate/cli.py:1217-1218` in the v1.1.0 source documents the gap: *"For Phase 1 the variable is exported but Reflex doesn't read it yet."* This comment was internal-facing; the user-facing documentation (README, CHANGELOG, SHIP_GATE) advertised the contract as enforced. This advisory is filed primarily because the runtime contradicted an operator-facing security claim. Code-only bugs of comparable shape (auth check missing entirely from a path) would already warrant disclosure; the additional false-promise dimension raises the severity. Impact An attacker who reaches the bound port can: • Read uploaded datasets rendered in the UI preview, including content of any JSONL/CSV/TXT file the legitimate operator has uploaded for fine-tuning. • Trigger arbitrary training runs against any base model the operator has installed locally or that can be downloaded from HuggingFace. • Trigger HuggingFace Hub pushes to repositories named via the UI input (subject to the operator's local HF token's scope — typically all repos owned by the operator). • Cause disk-fill DoS via the `rx.upload` endpoint (no size cap, no extension filter, no per-session count cap in v1.1.0 / v1.1.1). • Read model paths (`source_model_path`, `dataset_path`, `model`, `uploaded_path`) which are user-supplied and bypass the `safe_path()` helper that lives in `backpropagate/ui_security.py` (path validation is dead code on the Reflex surface in v1.1.0 / v1.1.1). The combination of unauthenticated training control, HF push target spoofing, and path-input traversal makes the affected endpoint suitable for both data exfiltration (reading uploaded training data) and supply-chain attacks (pushing tampered model weights to the operator's HF account). The local-only default (no `--share`) reduces exposure to a host-local attacker. The `--share` flag is documented as a "public URL" feature; operators who used `--share --auth user:pass` had no warning that the auth half was inert. Patches Fixed in v1.2.0 (released 2026-05-23). The patch implements real ASGI middleware via `rx.App(api_transformer=basic_auth_transformer)` that gates HTTP routes AND the `/_event` WebSocket upgrade. Four modes (`no_auth_local_only` / `token_auto` / `explicit_creds` / `production`), HMAC-signed cookie validated PRE-`websocket.accept()`, Host + Origin allowlists. The middleware ships alongside a 4-layer defense in depth at the cli.py / ui_app/app.py / rxconfig.py / env-strip surfaces so direct `python -m reflex run` invocations (bypassing the CLI guard) also enforce authentication. Upgrade with: • pip: `pip install --upgrade backpropagate` • npm: `npm install -g @mcptoolshop/backpropagate@latest` Full release notes: https://github.com/mcp-tool-shop-org/backpropagate/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#120---2026-05-23 Workarounds If users cannot upgrade immediately: 1. Do not pass `--auth` or `--share` to `backprop ui`. Run the UI with no flags (`backprop ui`); it will bind to `localhost` and accept any client that can reach `127.0.0.1`. 2. For remote access, use SSH port-forwarding instead of `--share`: ``` # On the client: ssh -L 7860:localhost:7860 # On the server: backprop ui # no --share # Then open http://localhost:7860 in your local browser. ``` SSH provides the authentication layer the Reflex UI did not. 3. Audit existing deployments. If any host running `backpropagate >= 1.1.0` has previously been launched with `--share`, treat any uploaded training data, model paths, or HF push targets visible in that UI session as potentially exposed. Re-issue HF tokens that have been in use during such sessions. Binary distribution gap. Standalone binaries (Windows .exe / macOS .app via PyInstaller) failed to build for v1.2.0 and will land in a follow-up patch release. In the interim, users who relied on the v1.1.x binary distribution should install the patched version via `pip install backpropagate==1.2.0` to receive the auth-bypass fix. The v1.2.0 PyPI package and `@mcptoolshop/[email protected]` npm package both carry the patched code. Credit Discovered by the dogfood-swarm Stage A audit on 2026-05-22 (finding ID `FRONTEND-A-001`, classified CRITICAL). The audit also surfaced contradicting documentation in CHANGELOG / SHIP_GATE / README; those were corrected in v1.2.0 alongside the runtime fix.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-48797 Backpropagate is a Python library for fine-tuning large language models on a single GPU. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (3)

  • CWE-1295 Debug Messages Revealing Unnecessary Information weakness
  • CWE-358 Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard weakness
  • CWE-862 Missing Authorization weakness

References