GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Packagist
GHSA-fvwq-45qv-xvhv CraftCMS vulnerable to reflective XSS via incomplete return URL sanitization
MEDIUM
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-31859
- Ecosystem
- Packagist
- Packages
- craftcms/cms
- Severity
- Moderate
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-116, CWE-79
- Reviewed
- 2026-03-11
Affected packages
• Packagist craftcms/cms: >= 4.15.3, < 4.17.3 → fixed in 4.17.3
• Packagist craftcms/cms: >= 5.7.5, < 5.9.7 → fixed in 5.9.7
Description
Summary
The fix for CVE-2025-35939 in `craftcms/cms` introduced a `strip_tags()` call in `src/web/User.php` to sanitize return URLs before they are stored in the session. However, `strip_tags()` only removes HTML tags (angle brackets) -- it does not inspect or filter URL schemes. Payloads like `javascript:alert(document.cookie)` contain no HTML tags and pass through `strip_tags()` completely unmodified, enabling reflected XSS when the return URL is rendered in an `href` attribute.
Details
The patched code in is:
```php
public function setReturnUrl($url): void
{
parent::setReturnUrl(strip_tags($url));
}
```
`strip_tags()` removes HTML tags (e.g., ``, ``) from a string, but it is not a URL sanitizer. When the sanitized return URL is subsequently rendered in an `href` attribute context (e.g., ``), the following dangerous payloads survive `strip_tags()` completely unmodified:
1. `javascript:` protocol URLs -- `javascript:alert(document.cookie)` contains no HTML tags, so `strip_tags()` returns it verbatim. When placed in an `href`, clicking the link executes the JavaScript.
2. `data:` URIs -- `data:text/html;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5hbGVydCgxKTwvc2NyaXB0Pg==` uses Base64 encoding and contains no tags at all, bypassing `strip_tags()` entirely.
3. Protocol-relative URLs -- `//evil.com/steal` contains no tags and is passed through unchanged. When rendered as an `href`, the browser resolves it relative to the current page’s protocol, redirecting the user to an attacker-controlled domain.
The core issue is that `strip_tags()` operates on HTML syntax (angle brackets) while the threat model here requires URL scheme validation. These are fundamentally different security concerns.
Impact
Reflected XSS via crafted return URL. An attacker constructs a malicious link such as `https://target.example.com/craft/?returnUrl=javascript:alert(document.cookie)` and sends it to a victim. The attack flow is:
1. Victim clicks the link, visiting the Craft CMS site.
2. The application calls `setReturnUrl()` with the attacker-controlled value.
3. `strip_tags()` processes the URL but finds no HTML tags -- it passes through unchanged.
4. The URL is stored in the session and later rendered in an `href` attribute (e.g., a "Return" or "Continue" link).
5. When the victim clicks that link, `javascript:alert(document.cookie)` executes in the context of the Craft CMS origin.
This enables:
• Session hijacking via cookie theft (`document.cookie`)
• Data exfiltration via `fetch()` to an attacker-controlled server
• Phishing by redirecting to a lookalike domain (protocol-relative URL)
• CSRF by performing actions on behalf of the authenticated user
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-31859 Craft is a content management system (CMS). vulnerability