GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm
GHSA-hw9r-h9mr-4jff OpenClaw: Scoped chat.send route inheritance could bypass admin command scope gates
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Packages
- openclaw
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses
- CWE-862, CWE-863
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-02
Affected packages
• npm openclaw: < 2026.5.18 → fixed in 2026.5.18
Description
Summary
Some internal command handlers require `operator.approvals` or `operator.admin` scopes. In affected releases, a scoped Gateway `chat.send` request delivered through an inherited external route could be evaluated as an external-channel command while still carrying the lower Gateway client scopes.
This issue affects scoped Gateway clients. It does not apply to shared-secret bearer HTTP compatibility endpoints, which are documented as full operator surfaces under OpenClaw's trust model.
Affected configurations
This affects deployments where a scoped Gateway caller with `operator.write` can use `chat.send` with delivery into a session that has an inherited external delivery route.
Impact
Commands that should have required `operator.approvals` or `operator.admin` could run with only `operator.write` in this routed context. Affected command families included approval resolution and selected administrative commands such as plugin, config, MCP, allowlist, and ACP mutations.
Patched Versions
The first stable patched version is `2026.5.18`.
Mitigations
Upgrade to `[email protected]` or later. Before upgrading, avoid granting `operator.write` tokens to clients that can deliver commands into sessions with external routes unless those clients are trusted with admin-like command effects.