GHSA-mpcw-3j5p-p99x Butterfly's parseJSON, getJSON functions eval malicious input, leading to remote code execution (RCE)

• Maven org.openrefine.dependencies:butterfly: < 1.2.6 → fixed in 1.2.6

Summary Usage of the `Butterfly.prototype.parseJSON` or `getJSON` functions on an attacker-controlled crafted input string allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server. Since Butterfly JavaScript code has access to Java classes, it can run arbitrary programs. Details The `parseJSON` function (edu/mit/simile/butterfly/Butterfly.js:64) works by calling `eval`, an approach that goes back to the original library by Crockford, before JSON was part of the ECMAScript language. It uses a regular expression to remove strings from the input, then checks that there are no unexpected characters in the non-string remainder. However, the regex is imperfect, as was discovered earlier by Mike Samuel; specifically, the "cleaner" can be tricked into treating part of the input as a string that the "evaluator" does not, because of a difference in interpretation regarding the the Unicode zero-width joiner character. Representing that character with a visible symbol, a malicious input looks like: ```js "\�\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec('gnome-calculator')) // " ``` This is understood... • by `JSON_cleaning_RE` as a single string, and because it is a string it can be collapsed to nothing, which is not problematic, so the original input proceeds to `eval`. • by the `eval` function, which ignores zero-width joiners entirely, as a string containing a single escaped backslash, followed by a comma, then a function call, closing parenthesis, and finally a line comment. The function call is evaluated, and a calculator is opened. Possible mitigations and additional defenses could include: • Replacing the JSON implementation with Rhino's built-in implementation. • Dropping all JSON-related and JSONP-related code entirely. • Restricting the access the JavaScript controller code has to the rest of the system by using `initSafeStandardObjects` instead of `initStandardObjects`, using `setClassShutter`, and so on. PoC Change OpenRefine `core` `controller.js` to add a call to the vulnerable `getJSON` function: ```diff diff --git a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js index 4ceba0676..1ce0936d2 100644 --- a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js +++ b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js @@ -631,0 +632,5 @@ function process(path, request, response) { + if (path == "getjsontest") { + butterfly.getJSON(request); + return true; + } + ``` Then, restart OpenRefine and submit the malicious request. For example, the following `bash` command (with $' quoting) should do it: ``` curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8' --data $'"\\\u200d\\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(\'gnome-calculator\')) // "' http://localhost:3333/getjsontest ``` Impact Any JavaScript controller that calls one of these functions is vulnerable to remote code execution. OpenRefine itself seems unaffected; both OpenRefine and jQuery have their own functions also called parseJSON and getJSON, but those are unrelated.