GitHub Advisoryadvisory · PyPI

GHSA-q5qq-mvfm-j35x Fickling has Static Analysis Bypass via Incomplete Dangerous Module Blocklist

HIGH Published 2026-01-09 Modified 2026-01-11 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-22609
Ecosystem
PyPI
Packages
fickling
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weaknesses
CWE-184, CWE-502
Reviewed
2026-01-09

Affected packages

• PyPI fickling: < 0.1.7 → fixed in 0.1.7

Description

Fickling's assessment `ctypes`, `importlib`, `runpy`, `code` and `multiprocessing` were added the list of unsafe imports (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9a2b3f89bd0598b528d62c10a64c1986fcb09f66, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/eb299b453342f1931c787bcb3bc33f3a03a173f9, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/29d5545e74b07766892c1f0461b801afccee4f91, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/b793563e60a5e039c5837b09d7f4f6b92e6040d1, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/b793563e60a5e039c5837b09d7f4f6b92e6040d1). Original report Summary The `unsafe_imports()` method in Fickling's static analyzer fails to flag several high-risk Python modules that can be used for arbitrary code execution. Malicious pickles importing these modules will not be detected as unsafe, allowing attackers to bypass Fickling's primary static safety checks. Details In `fickling/fickle.py` lines 866-884, the `unsafe_imports()` method checks imported modules against a hardcoded tuple: ```python def unsafe_imports(self) -> Iterator[ast.Import | ast.ImportFrom]: for node in self.properties.imports: if node.module in ( "__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins", "os", "posix", "nt", "subprocess", "sys", "builtins", "socket", "pty", "marshal", "types", ): yield node ``` This list is incomplete. The following dangerous modules are NOT detected: • ctypes: Allows arbitrary memory access, calling C functions, and bypassing Python restrictions entirely • importlib: Can dynamically import any module at runtime • runpy: Can execute Python modules as scripts • code: Can compile and execute arbitrary Python code • multiprocessing: Can spawn processes with arbitrary code Since `ctypes` is part of the Python standard library, it also bypasses the `NonStandardImports` analysis. PoC ```python from fickling.fickle import Pickled from fickling.analysis import check_safety, Severity Pickle that imports ctypes.pythonapi (allows arbitrary code execution) PROTO 4, GLOBAL 'ctypes pythonapi', STOP payload = b'\x80\x04cctypes\npythonapi\n.' pickled = Pickled.load(payload) results = check_safety(pickled) print(f"Severity: {results.severity.name}") print(f"Is safe: {results.severity == Severity.LIKELY_SAFE}") Output: Severity is LIKELY_SAFE or low - the ctypes import is not flagged A truly malicious pickle using ctypes could execute arbitrary code ``` Impact Security Bypass (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) An attacker can craft a malicious pickle that: 1. Imports `ctypes` to gain arbitrary memory access 2. Uses `ctypes.pythonapi` or `ctypes.CDLL` to execute arbitrary code 3. Passes Fickling's safety analysis as "likely safe" 4. Executes malicious code when the victim loads the pickle after trusting Fickling's verdict This undermines the core purpose of Fickling as a pickle safety scanner.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-22609 Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (2)

  • CWE-184 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs weakness
  • CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data weakness

References