GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-q6mh-rqwh-g786 Note Mark has a JWT Secret Weakness that allows Full Account Takeover via Token Forgery

CRITICAL Published 2026-05-07 Modified 2026-05-15 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-44523
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend
Severity
Critical
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weaknesses
CWE-326, CWE-345
Reviewed
2026-05-07

Affected packages

• Go github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend: < 0.0.0-20260501152247-18b587758667 → fixed in 0.0.0-20260501152247-18b587758667

Description

Summary No minimum length or entropy is enforced on the `JWT_SECRET` configuration value. The application accepts any base64-decodable secret regardless of size, including secrets as short as 1 byte. HS256 secrets below 32 bytes are brute-forceable offline, allowing attackers to recover the signing key and forge valid JWTs for arbitrary users. --- Impact An attacker who captures a single valid JWT (e.g, from cookies, logs, or network traffic) can: \> Crack the signing secret offline using brute-force or wordlist attacks \> Forge valid JWTs for any user ID (including administrators) \> Authenticate without knowing any credentials This results in full account takeover across the entire application with no server-side detection or rate limiting possible. --- Details In `backend/config/utils.go`, the `Base64Decoded.UnmarshalText` function decodes the JWT secret but does not validate its length or entropy. In `backend/core/auth.go`, JWT tokens are signed using HS256 without enforcing minimum key size requirements. According to RFC 7518 Section 3.2, HS256 keys must be at least 256 bits (32 bytes). Libraries such as PyJWT explicitly warn against shorter keys, but note-mark performs no such validation. --- PoC 1- Deploy note-mark with a weak secret: ``` JWT_SECRET = base64("testsecret123456789012345") ``` 2- Register an account and capture the `Auth-Session-Token` cookie 3- Crack the secret offline (example using Python): ```python import jwt, base64 jwt.decode(TOKEN, base64.b64decode(SECRET), algorithms=["HS256"]) ``` 4- Forge a new token for any user UUID with extended expiry 5- Send the forged token in requests → server returns 200 Ok and authenticates as that user --- Reproduction Steps 1- Deploy the application with a JWT secret shorter than 32 bytes (after base64 decoding) 2- Authenticate and capture a valid JWT 3- Perform offline brute-force or dictionary attack against the token signature 4- Recover the secret 5- Generate a forged JWT for another user 6- Use the forged token to access protected endpoints --- Fix Recommendation • Enforce a minimum of 32 bytes (256 bits) for JWT secrets after base64 decoding • Reject weak secrets during configuration parsing (e.g., in `Base64Decoded.UnmarshalText` or config validation) • Optionally log warnings or fail startup if the secret is insecure --- Resources • RFC 7518 Section 3.2 (JSON Web Algorithms - HMAC key size requirements) • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength • CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity ---

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-44523 Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (2)

  • CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength weakness
  • CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity weakness

References