GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv Fiber vulnerable to XSS in AutoFormat Content Negotiation

MEDIUM Published 2026-05-05 Modified 2026-05-13 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-42554
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3, github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
Weaknesses
CWE-79
Reviewed
2026-05-05

Affected packages

• Go github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3: < 3.2.0 → fixed in 3.2.0 • Go github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2: < 2.52.13 → fixed in 2.52.13

Description

Summary Description A Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Go Fiber allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript by supplying `Accept: text/html` on any request whose handler passes attacker-influenced data to the AutoFormat() feature. This affects `github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3` (`DefaultRes.AutoFormat`) through version 3.1.0 and `github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2` (`Ctx.Format`) through version 2.52.12. The developer opts into content negotiation by calling AutoFormat(), but does not opt into raw HTML emission for a particular request; Fiber chooses that branch from attacker-controlled Accept. Five of the six branches of the same method already escape. `JSON`, `XML`, `MsgPack`, and `CBOR` all route through encoders that neutralize markup; the txt branch emits `text/plain` and cannot execute. The html branch is the sole outlier in a method whose name (`AutoFormat`) and symmetrical structure actively telegraph "safe, format-agnostic reply." Details The issue resides in `res.go` within `(*DefaultRes).AutoFormat()`. The method negotiates against the request Accept header, selects one of `html | json | txt | xml | msgpack | cbor`, and serializes the caller-supplied body accordingly. The "html" branch concatenates the stringified body directly into HTML markup with no output encoding: • `accept` comes from `r.c.Accepts(...)`, i.e. is fully attacker-controlled. An attacker can force the "html" branch on any `AutoFormat()` call regardless of which format the developer tested against. • `b` is produced from `body` via direct assignment (`string` / `[]byte`) or `fmt.Sprintf("%v", body)`. No `html.EscapeString` is applied. • The resulting string is sent as `text/html; charset=utf-8`, so browsers render it as active HTML. ```go // res.go func (r *DefaultRes) AutoFormat(body any) error { accept := r.c.DefaultReq.Accepts("html", "json", "txt", "xml", "msgpack", "cbor") r.Type(accept) var b string switch val := body.(type) { case string: b = val case []byte: b = r.c.app.toString(val) default: b = fmt.Sprintf("%v", val) } switch accept { case "txt": return r.SendString(b) case "json": return r.JSON(body) case "xml": return r.XML(body) case "html": return r.SendString("" + b + "") case "msgpack": return r.MsgPack(body) case "cbor": return r.CBOR(body) } return r.SendString(b) } ``` Impact This impacts all current v3 releases ≤ 3.1.0 containing `DefaultRes.AutoFormat`, and all current v2 releases ≤ 2.52.12 where the identical `"" + b + ""` construction exists in `(*Ctx).Format()`. Exploitation requires that an application call `c.AutoFormat(v)` where `v` (or a field stringified by `%v`) contains request-influenced data. A handler that uses `AutoFormat()` to serve multiple representations of the same data can be turned into an HTML XSS sink when the client sends `Accept: text/html`, even if the developer only tested the JSON path. This may result in: • Reflected XSS in the application's origin via any request-derived value reaching `AutoFormat`. • Stored XSS where the reflected value originates from persisted input later passed to `AutoFormat`. Proposed Patch The injection surface is `r.Type("html")` followed by `r.SendString(b)` with unescaped caller data, where it constructs markup on the caller's behalf around a value whose HTML-ness the caller did not declare. A few options: • `AutoFormat()` should treat `body` as data, not markup, in the `"html"` branch and escape it before concatenating it into the framework-generated `` wrapper. Callers that need raw negotiated HTML should use `Format()` with an explicit HTML handler. • Introduce a sibling method that escapes, leave `AutoFormat` alone for backward compatibility. HTML-escape the value in the "html" branch before concatenating it into the `` wrapper. ```go import "html" // ... case "html": return r.SendString("" + html.EscapeString(b) + "") ``` `html.EscapeString` escapes ``, `&`, `'`, `"`, which is sufficient for an element-text context. Apply the same change to v2's `(*Ctx).Format()`. Proof of Concept ```bash Create project directory mkdir fiber-xss-poc && cd fiber-xss-poc Initialize Go module go mod init fiber-xss-poc Install Fiber v3 go get github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3 Create the PoC file cat > main.go alert(document.domain)' -H 'Accept: text/html' {1 alert(document.domain)} ```

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation weakness

References