GitHub Advisoryadvisory · PyPI

GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in SoftFileLock

MEDIUM Published 2026-01-13 Modified 2026-01-13 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-22701
Ecosystem
PyPI
Packages
filelock
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59
Reviewed
2026-01-13

Affected packages

• PyPI filelock: < 3.20.3 → fixed in 3.20.3

Description

Vulnerability Summary Title: Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in SoftFileLock Affected Component: `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class File: `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27 CWE: CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59 --- Description A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock` implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly. The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between `raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an unintended target file or leading to denial of service. Attack Scenario ``` 1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock 2. Permission validation passes 3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock 4. os.open() tries to create lock file 5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails ``` --- Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ This is a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition vulnerability affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for inter-process synchronization. Affected Users: • Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly • Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl` support (e.g., GraalPy) Consequences: • Silent lock acquisition failure - applications may not detect that exclusive resource access is not guaranteed • Denial of Service - attacker can prevent lock file creation by maintaining symlink • Resource serialization failures - multiple processes may acquire "locks" simultaneously • Unintended file operations - lock could operate on attacker-controlled files CVSS v4.0 Score: 5.6 (Medium) Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N Attack Requirements: • Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files • Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users on Unix/Linux) • Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window --- Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag to prevent symlink following during lock file creation. Patched Version: Next release (commit: 255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0) Mitigation Details: • The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades on platforms without support • On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink attacks are completely prevented • On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window remains but is documented Users should: • Upgrade to the patched version when available • For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock` --- Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ For users unable to update immediately: 1. Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts - use `UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already patched for CVE-2025-68146) 2. Restrict filesystem permissions - prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks in lock file directories: ```bash chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory ``` 3. Use process isolation - isolate untrusted code from lock file paths to prevent symlink creation 4. Monitor lock operations - implement application-level checks to verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical operations --- References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_ • Similar Vulnerability: CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock) • CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html • CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html • CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html • O_NOFOLLOW documentation: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html • GitHub Repository: https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock --- Reported by: George Tsigourakos (@tsigouris007)

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-22701 filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (3)

  • CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization weakness
  • CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition weakness
  • CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access weakness

References