GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Hex

GHSA-qpxh-ff8m-c62v mpp vulnerable to Gas Draining with access list

MEDIUM Published 2026-09-25 Modified 2026-09-25 Official page ↗
Ecosystem
Hex
Packages
mpp
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weaknesses
CWE-20
Reviewed
2026-09-25

Affected packages

• Hex mpp: >= 0.2.0, < 0.6.0 → fixed in 0.6.0

Description

Details When the server acts as the fee_payer, `mpp` Elixir 0.4.0 copies the client-supplied EIP-2930 access list verbatim into the cosigned fee-payer transaction. In `cosign_fee_payer`, the server re-signs the raw `base_fields` (index 5 of the 0x76 AASigned envelope) without inspecting the access list field, which is part of the signed payload. Access list gas is charged intrinsically — before any opcode executes — regardless of whether the listed addresses are ever touched. An attacker submits a valid `transferWithMemo` alongside fabricated address-only access list entries. The server validates calldata and amount but never inspects `access_list` length. It cosigns and broadcasts a transaction that costs the fee-payer wallet `N × 2,400` extra gas per request with no corresponding work performed on-chain. At the default of 137 entries and 100 Gwei `max_fee_per_gas`, this inflates the fee-payer cost from the normal ~51,287 gas to ~380,087 gas — a 7.4× multiplier — while staying within Bandit's default 10,000-byte per-header-field limit (verified empirically). PoC The PoC is provided below. It is configured to reproduce the attack on Tempo Moderate testnet within a Docker environment. Download the PoC and run: ```bash unzip mpp_elixir_PoC.zip cd mpp_elixir docker build -t mpp-elixir-access-list . docker run --rm mpp-elixir-access-list ``` There are more details in `mpp_elixir/README.md` Impact A malicious client can force the server to pay ~7.4x the normal transaction fee. This dramatically increases operational costs and completely destroys the profit margin on low-cost items.

Related

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation weakness

References