GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm

GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names

HIGH Published 2026-04-01 Modified 2026-04-01 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-4800
Ecosystem
npm
Packages
lodash, lodash-es, lodash-amd, lodash.template
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-94
Reviewed
2026-04-01

Affected packages

• npm lodash: >= 4.0.0, < 4.18.0 → fixed in 4.18.0 • npm lodash-es: >= 4.0.0, < 4.18.0 → fixed in 4.18.0 • npm lodash-amd: >= 4.0.0, < 4.18.0 → fixed in 4.18.0 • npm lodash.template: >= 4.0.0, < 4.18.0 → fixed in 4.18.0

Description

Impact The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the `variable` option in `_.template` but did not apply the same validation to `options.imports` key names. Both paths flow into the same `Function()` constructor sink. When an application passes untrusted input as `options.imports` key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time. Additionally, `_.template` uses `assignInWith` to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via `for..in`. If `Object.prototype` has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to `Function()`. Patches Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0. The fix applies two changes: 1. Validate `importsKeys` against the existing `reForbiddenIdentifierChars` regex (same check already used for the `variable` option) 2. Replace `assignInWith` with `assignWith` when merging imports, so only own properties are enumerated Workarounds Do not pass untrusted input as key names in `options.imports`. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-4800 The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports… vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code weakness

References