GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm
GHSA-vg6v-j97m-h5xq @novu/application-generic: `validateUrlSsrf` permits CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) destinations — affects Workflow HTTP request step + Webhook filter condition
MEDIUM
Official page ↗
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Packages
- @novu/application-generic
- Severity
- Moderate
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-918
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-28
Affected packages
• npm @novu/application-generic: < 3.17.0 → fixed in 3.17.0
Description
Hi Novu team,
Reporting an SSRF blocklist gap in the shared `validateUrlSsrf` guard. A complete self-contained reproduction is inlined below — copy the four files into a directory and run `docker compose up`, plus a single-file probe that runs against Node directly. Locally validated against HEAD `291817c`.
Summary
Novu's shared SSRF guard `validateUrlSsrf(url)` is used before server-side requests to user-configured URLs. The guard resolves hostnames and blocks a regex list of private/reserved IP ranges, but it does not block `100.64.0.0/10` shared address space. As a result, Novu features protected by this guard can still send server-side requests to destinations such as `100.100.100.200` (Alibaba Cloud metadata service) and any other service reachable in `100.64.0.0/10`.
Affected code
Guard:
• `libs/application-generic/src/utils/ssrf-url-validation.ts`
• `isPrivateIp(...)` regex list at lines 9-28
• DNS resolution and address validation at lines 55-72
Product call-sites:
• Workflow HTTP request step: `apps/worker/src/app/workflow/usecases/send-message/execute-http-request-step.usecase.ts` — calls `validateUrlSsrf(url)` at line 149, then uses `HttpClientService` to send the request.
• Webhook filter condition: `libs/application-generic/src/usecases/conditions-filter/conditions-filter.usecase.ts` — calls `validateUrlSsrf(child.webhookUrl)` at line 265, then sends `axios.post(child.webhookUrl, ...)` at line 277.
HTTP client:
• `libs/application-generic/src/services/http-client/http-client.service.ts` — uses `got(gotOptions)` at lines 120 and 142 after the preflight validation.
Root cause
The SSRF guard uses a hand-written regex deny-list:
```ts
/^0\.0\.0\.0$/i,
/^127\./,
/^10\./,
/^172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./,
/^192\.168\./,
/^169\.254\./,
/^::ffff:127\./i,
/^::ffff:10\./i,
/^::ffff:172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./i,
/^::ffff:192\.168\./i,
/^::ffff:169\.254\./i,
/^::1$/,
/^fc00:/i,
/^fe80:/i,
```
This list omits `100.64.0.0/10`, also called shared address space or CGNAT. These addresses are not RFC1918 private addresses, but they are also not normal public-internet destinations. Cloud and infrastructure providers commonly use special-use address ranges for metadata and internal services; Alibaba Cloud metadata is available at `100.100.100.200`.
Reproduction — Part 1: unit-level probe (no Docker required)
Save the following file and run with `node novu_ssrf_guard_probe.js`. The script replicates `validateUrlSsrf` from `libs/application-generic/src/utils/ssrf-url-validation.ts` verbatim (the `isPrivateIp` regex list is copied as-is) and tests several URL categories.
`novu_ssrf_guard_probe.js`
```javascript
const dns = require('dns/promises');
function isPrivateIp(ip) {
const privateRanges = [
/^0\.0\.0\.0$/i,
/^127\./,
/^10\./,
/^172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./,
/^192\.168\./,
/^169\.254\./,
/^::ffff:127\./i,
/^::ffff:10\./i,
/^::ffff:172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./i,
/^::ffff:192\.168\./i,
/^::ffff:169\.254\./i,
/^::1$/,
/^fc00:/i,
/^fe80:/i,
];
return privateRanges.some((range) => range.test(ip));
}
async function validateUrlSsrf(url) {
let parsed;
try {
parsed = new URL(url);
} catch {
return 'Invalid URL format.';
}
if (parsed.protocol !== 'http:' && parsed.protocol !== 'https:') {
return `URL scheme "${parsed.protocol}" is not allowed.`;
}
const hostname = parsed.hostname.toLowerCase();
const blockedHostnames = ['localhost', 'metadata.google.internal'];
if (blockedHostnames.includes(hostname)) {
return `Requests to "${hostname}" are not allowed.`;
}
let addresses;
try {
addresses = await dns.lookup(hostname, { all: true });
} catch {
return `Unable to resolve hostname "${hostname}".`;
}
for (const { address } of addresses) {
if (isPrivateIp(address)) {
return `Requests to private or reserved IP addresses are not allowed (resolved: ${address}).`;
}
}
return null;
}
async function main() {
for (const url of [
'http://127.0.0.1/',
'http://0.0.0.0/',
'http://0.0.0.1/',
'http://169.254.169.254/',
'http://100.64.0.1/',
'http://100.100.100.200/',
'http://224.0.0.1/',
'http://[fd00::1]/',
'http://[64:ff9b::7f00:1]/',
'http://[::ffff:100.64.0.1]/',
'http://8.8.8.8/',
]) {
console.log(JSON.stringify({ url, verdict: (await validateUrlSsrf(url)) ?? 'ALLOW' }));
}
}
main().catch((e) => { console.error(e); process.exitCode = 1; });
```
Expected output (relevant lines)
```json
{"url":"http://127.0.0.1/","verdict":"Requests to private or reserved IP addresses are not allowed (resolved: 127.0.0.1)."}
{"url":"http://169.254.169.254/","verdict":"Requests to private or reserved IP addresses are not allowed (resolved: 169.254.169.254)."}
{"url":"http://100.64.0.1/","verdict":"ALLOW"}
{"url":"http://100.100.100.200/","verdict":"ALLOW"}
{"url":"http://8.8.8.8/","verdict":"ALLOW"}
```
The 2nd and 3rd `ALLOW` rows are the bypass — both are non-public destinations the guard should refuse.
Reproduction — Part 2: end-to-end Docker CGNAT proof
Save the three files below into a directory, then:
```bash
docker compose up --abort-on-container-exit --exit-code-from novu-client
```
This mirrors the product sequence in `execute-http-request-step.usecase.ts`: resolve hostname → validate with `validateUrlSsrf` → send HTTP request. The "target" container is bound to a CGNAT address (`100.64.0.20`) on a custom subnet, simulando a cloud-internal service reachable on the CGNAT range.
`docker-compose.yml`
```yaml
services:
cgnat-target:
image: python:3.12-alpine
command: python -u /srv/target.py
volumes:
• ./target.py:/srv/target.py:ro
networks:
novu-cgnat:
ipv4_address: 100.64.0.20
novu-client:
image: node:22-alpine
command: node /srv/client.js
volumes:
• ./client.js:/srv/client.js:ro
depends_on:
• cgnat-target
networks:
novu-cgnat:
ipv4_address: 100.64.0.10
networks:
novu-cgnat:
ipam:
config:
• subnet: 100.64.0.0/24
```
`target.py`
```python
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_POST(self):
print(f"[target] {self.client_address[0]} POST {self.path}", flush=True)
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header("content-type", "application/json")
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(b'{"marker":"NOVU_CGNAT_SSRF_OK"}\n')
def log_message(self, fmt, *args): return
HTTPServer(("100.64.0.20", 8080), Handler).serve_forever()
```
`client.js`
```javascript
const dns = require('dns/promises');
function isPrivateIp(ip) {
const privateRanges = [
/^0\.0\.0\.0$/i, /^127\./, /^10\./,
/^172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./, /^192\.168\./, /^169\.254\./,
/^::ffff:127\./i, /^::ffff:10\./i,
/^::ffff:172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./i,
/^::ffff:192\.168\./i, /^::ffff:169\.254\./i,
/^::1$/, /^fc00:/i, /^fe80:/i,
];
return privateRanges.some((range) => range.test(ip));
}
async function validateUrlSsrf(url) {
const parsed = new URL(url);
if (!['http:', 'https:'].includes(parsed.protocol)) return 'bad scheme';
if (['localhost', 'metadata.google.internal'].includes(parsed.hostname.toLowerCase())) {
return 'blocked hostname';
}
const addresses = await dns.lookup(parsed.hostname, { all: true });
for (const { address } of addresses) {
if (isPrivateIp(address)) return `blocked ${address}`;
}
return null;
}
async function waitForTarget(url) {
for (let attempt = 0; attempt setTimeout(resolve, 250));
}
}
}
async function main() {
const url = 'http://cgnat-target:8080/workflow-http-step';
const addresses = await dns.lookup('cgnat-target', { all: tr…
Related
Weakness · CWE (1)
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery weakness