GitHub Advisoryadvisory · Hex

GHSA-x2w3-23jr-hrpf ewe Has Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (HTTP Request/Response Splitting)

MEDIUM Published 2026-04-01 Modified 2026-04-06 Official page ↗
Aliases
CVE-2026-34715
Ecosystem
Hex
Packages
ewe
Severity
Moderate
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses
CWE-113
Reviewed
2026-04-01

Affected packages

• Hex ewe: < 3.0.6 → fixed in 3.0.6

Description

Summary The `encode_headers` function in `src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam` directly interpolates response header keys and values into raw HTTP bytes without validating or stripping CRLF (`\r\n`) sequences. An application that passes user-controlled data into response headers (e.g., setting a `Location` redirect header from a request parameter) allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP response content, leading to response splitting, cache poisoning, and possible cross-site scripting. Notably, ewe *does* validate CRLF in incoming request headers via `validate_field_value()` in the HTTP/1.1 parser — but provides no equivalent protection for outgoing response headers in the encoder. Details File: `src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam` Vulnerable code: ```gleam fn encode_headers(headers: List(#(String, String))) -> BitArray { let headers = list.fold(headers, >, fn(acc, headers) { let #(key, value) = headers > }) > } ``` Both `key` and `value` are embedded directly into the `BitArray` output. If either contains `\r\n`, the resulting bytes become a structurally valid but attacker-controlled HTTP response, terminating the current header early and injecting new headers or a second HTTP response. Contrast with request parsing (`src/ewe/internal/http1.gleam`): incoming header values are protected: ```gleam use value replace_error(InvalidHeaders) ) ``` No analogous validation exists for outgoing header values in the encoder. The solution is to strip or reject `\r` (0x0D) and `\n` (0x0A) from all header key and value strings in `encode_headers` before encoding, mirroring the validation already applied to incoming request headers via `validate_field_value()` PoC An ewe application echoes a user-supplied redirect URL into a `Location` header: ```gleam fn handle_request(req: Request) -> Response { let redirect_url = request.get_query(req) |> result.try(list.key_find(_, "next")) |> result.unwrap("/home") response.new(302) |> response.set_header("location", redirect_url) |> response.set_body(ewe.Empty) } ``` Attacker request: ```bash printf 'GET /?next=https://example.com%%0d%%0aX-Injected:%%20true HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost\r\n\r\n' | nc -w 2 localhost 8080 ``` Resulting response: ``` HTTP/1.1 302 Found location: https://example.com X-Injected: true content-length: 0 date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:53:00 GMT connection: keep-alive ``` The `X-Injected: true` header appears as a separate response header, confirming that CRLF sequences in user input are not sanitized by the encoder.

Related

Alias · CVE (1)

Weakness · CWE (1)

  • CWE-113 Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers weakness

References