GitHub Advisoryadvisory · npm
GHSA-x445-f3h2-j279 Auth.js: OAuth state, nonce, and PKCE check cookies are not bound to the provider that created them
MEDIUM
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-73419
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Packages
- @auth/core, next-auth
- Severity
- Moderate
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-345, CWE-346, CWE-940
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-23
Affected packages
• npm @auth/core: < 0.41.3 → fixed in 0.41.3
• npm next-auth: >= 5.0.0-beta.1, < 5.0.0-beta.32 → fixed in 5.0.0-beta.32
• npm next-auth: < 4.24.15 → fixed in 4.24.15
Description
Summary
Auth.js stores the OAuth/OIDC anti-CSRF checks (`state`, `nonce`, and the PKCE verifier) in global cookies that are not bound to the provider that created them. On callback, a check value minted during a sign-in started with one provider can satisfy the callback for a different provider, because the stored cookie is not verified against the callback provider's identity (provider id, issuer, client id, or redirect URI). In a multi-provider app that allows account linking while logged in, this provider-confusion / mix-up condition can let an attacker link their account at a second provider to a victim's user.
Am I affected?
You may be affected if all of the following hold:
• You use `next-auth` `= 5.0.0-beta.1, <= 5.0.0-beta.31`, or `@auth/core` `<= 0.41.2`.
• You configure multiple OAuth/OIDC providers.
• You allow users to link additional providers while logged in.
• At least one configured provider's authorization request is observable by an attacker, and at least one target provider's callback can be satisfied without a PKCE verifier (i.e. it relies only on `state` or only on `nonce`).
You are not affected if you use a single OAuth provider, do not allow logged-in account linking, or all providers enforce PKCE.
Impact
• Account-linking confusion: an attacker can get their account at a target provider linked to the victim's Auth.js user, granting the attacker persistent sign-in to the victim's account through that linked provider.
• Exploitation requires luring the victim into starting a legitimate same-origin flow; it cannot be performed by cross-site request forgery alone, which reduces practical likelihood.
Patched version
The fix binds the OAuth check cookies to the provider/authorization flow that created them, so a callback cannot consume a check value minted for a different provider. Upgrade to the first releases containing this fix (pending; this advisory will be updated with exact patched versions before publication).
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately:
• Enable PKCE (`checks: ["pkce"]`, in addition to `state`/`nonce`) on every provider that supports it; PKCE blocks the practical code-swap variant because the attacker cannot observe the relying party's verifier.
• Avoid offering logged-in account linking across multiple providers where one provider is lower-trust or attacker-observable.
• Treat `events.linkAccount` as sensitive: add audit logging, user notification, or out-of-band confirmation so that any unexpected link is visible (defense-in-depth, not a root-cause fix).
Credit
Reported by @Nadav0077. Thank you for the responsible disclosure.
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-73419 NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. vulnerability
References
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-x445-f3h2-j279 web
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73419 advisory
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/pull/13469 web
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/5bca2399a79ba8d116ca5179b4b1ebcd152e7f05 web
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/9f7a97fade9b1319bb9ac19fc9828d62e0a2a852 web
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth package
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/@auth/[email protected] web
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/[email protected] web
- https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/[email protected] web