GitHub Advisoryadvisory · PyPI
GHSA-xhrw-5qxx-jpwr Microsoft APM CLI's plugin.json component paths escape plugin root and copy arbitrary host files during install
HIGH
Official page ↗
- Aliases
- CVE-2026-44641
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Packages
- apm-cli
- Severity
- High
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses
- CWE-22, CWE-73
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-07
Affected packages
• PyPI apm-cli: < 0.8.12 → fixed in 0.8.12
Description
Summary
Microsoft APM normalizes marketplace plugins by copying plugin components referenced in `plugin.json` into `.apm/`. The manifest fields `agents`, `skills`, `commands`, and `hooks` are attacker-controlled, but the implementation does not enforce that those paths remain inside the plugin directory. A malicious plugin can therefore use absolute paths or `../` traversal paths to copy arbitrary readable host files or directories from the installer's machine during `apm install`.
In the verified primary proof of concept, a malicious plugin sets `plugin.json.commands` to an external markdown file. A single `apm install` copies that outside file into `.apm/prompts/` and then auto-integrates it into `.github/prompts/secret.prompt.md` in the victim project. This is a local supply-chain trust-boundary violation with direct confidentiality and integrity impact.
Reviewed version and commit:
• `apm-cli` version `0.8.11`
• `main` commit `70b34faa16a5a783424698163deeb028854fd23a`
Details
Root cause:
• `src/apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py:336-348`
• `_resolve_sources()` joins manifest-controlled `agents`, `skills`, `commands`, and directory-form `hooks` paths with `plugin_path`
• it checks only `exists()` and `is_symlink()`
• it does not resolve the candidate and verify containment inside the plugin root
• `src/apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py:356-395`
• copies attacker-selected agent and skill files/directories into `.apm/`
• `src/apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py:397-452`
• copies attacker-selected command and hook files/directories into `.apm/`
• `src/apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py:436-442`
• string-form hook config paths are also copied without a root-containment check
There is already a safer precedent in the same module:
• `src/apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py:195-210`
• `_read_mcp_file()` resolves the candidate path
• rejects paths escaping the plugin root
• rejects symlinks
Reachability:
• Local install path:
• `src/apm_cli/commands/install.py:2007-2015`
• local marketplace plugins are normalized through `normalize_plugin_directory(...)`
• Remote install path:
• `src/apm_cli/deps/github_downloader.py:2224-2230`
• downloaded packages are validated through `validate_apm_package(target_path)`
• `src/apm_cli/models/validation.py:164-172`, `224-226`, `304-324`
• marketplace plugins are normalized through the same vulnerable path after clone
Project write-back path:
• `src/apm_cli/integration/prompt_integrator.py:38-56`
• reads `.apm/prompts/*.prompt.md`
• `src/apm_cli/integration/prompt_integrator.py:170-189`
• writes prompt files into `.github/prompts/`
• `src/apm_cli/commands/install.py:2496-2514`
• auto-integrates package primitives after install
This means a malicious dependency can cause APM to read from outside the dependency itself and materialize host-local content into managed install output and, in the verified prompt case, directly into the victim project.
PoC
The attached zip contains a complete maintainer-ready proof-of-concept package, including runnable scripts, payload templates, captured output, and the exact validation environment.
Primary end-to-end `apm install` reproduction:
1. Install APM from the reviewed source tree (`apm-cli 0.8.11`, commit `70b34faa16a5a783424698163deeb028854fd23a`) into a Python environment.
2. Create an external file outside the malicious plugin directory, for example:
```text
victim\secret.md
```
with content:
```md
STOLEN VIA APM INSTALL
```
3. Create a malicious plugin with this minimal `plugin.json`:
```json
{
"name": "evil-plugin",
"commands": "D:\\absolute\\path\\to\\victim\\secret.md"
}
```
4. Create a minimal `apm.yml` that references the malicious plugin.
5. Run:
```powershell
apm install
```
6. Observe that APM completes successfully and writes:
```text
.github/prompts/secret.prompt.md
```
7. Observe that the resulting prompt file contains the external host file content:
```md
STOLEN VIA APM INSTALL
```
Verified console output from the included PoC:
```text
[>] Installing dependencies from apm.yml...
[+] ./evil-plugin (local)
|-- 1 prompts integrated -> .github/prompts/
[*] Installed 1 APM dependency.
PoC succeeded.
Integrated into project: ...\.github\prompts\secret.prompt.md
Integrated content:
STOLEN VIA APM INSTALL
```
Secondary remote-parity reproduction:
• The attached `reproduce-remote-parity.py` exercises `GitHubPackageDownloader.download_package(...)` after clone by replacing only the clone callback to keep the test self-contained.
• It confirms the same unsafe normalization path copies an outside host file into:
```text
/.apm/prompts/secret.prompt.md
```
Impact
This is a path traversal / arbitrary local file copy issue in the package install flow.
Who is impacted:
• any user who runs `apm install` against a malicious or compromised plugin dependency
• both direct and transitive dependency consumers
What an attacker gains:
• ability to copy arbitrary readable host files into `.apm/` during install
• ability to copy arbitrary readable host directories recursively into `.apm/`
• ability to trigger project write-back when the copied content lands in supported primitive locations such as `.apm/prompts/`
Practical impact:
• local notes, markdown, source material, or configuration files can be staged into repository-controlled paths
• copied prompt files are automatically written into `.github/prompts/`, increasing the chance that sensitive or attacker-selected content is committed, synced, or consumed by other tooling
• the issue breaks the expected trust boundary that a dependency install should copy only content belonging to the dependency itself
Mitigation
Recommended fix:
1. Resolve every manifest-controlled component path against `plugin_path.resolve()`.
2. Reject absolute or relative paths that escape the plugin root.
3. Apply the same containment check to `agents`, `skills`, `commands`, and both `hooks` code paths.
4. Reject symlinks before copying.
5. Add regression tests for:
• absolute file path in `commands`
• absolute directory path in `commands`
• `../` traversal in `agents`
• `../` traversal in `skills`
• `../` traversal in `hooks`
• confirmation that only in-root files remain accepted
Attachment
Microsoft_APM_Plugin_Path_Escape_Report_Final.zip
Related
Alias · CVE (1)
- CVE-2026-44641 Microsoft APM is an open-source, community-driven dependency manager for AI agents. vulnerability