MITRE ATT&CKtechnique

T1649 Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates

Published 2022-08-03 Modified 2026-08-04 Official page ↗
Domain
enterprise
Tactics
Credential Access
Platforms
Windows, Linux, macOS, Identity Provider
Version
1.2
Created
2022-08-03

Description

Adversaries may steal or forge certificates used for authentication to access remote systems or resources. Digital certificates are often used to sign and encrypt messages and/or files. Certificates are also used as authentication material. For example, Entra ID device certificates and Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) certificates bind to an identity and can be used as credentials for domain accounts. Authentication certificates can be both stolen and forged. For example, AD CS certificates can be stolen from encrypted storage (in the Registry or files), misplaced certificate files (i.e. Unsecured Credentials), or directly from the Windows certificate store via various crypto APIs. With appropriate enrollment rights, users and/or machines within a domain can also request and/or manually renew certificates from enterprise certificate authorities (CA). This enrollment process defines various settings and permissions associated with the certificate. Of note, the certificate’s extended key usage (EKU) values define signing, encryption, and authentication use cases, while the certificate’s subject alternative name (SAN) values define the certificate owner’s alternate names. Abusing certificates for authentication credentials may enable other behaviors such as Lateral Movement. Certificate-related misconfigurations may also enable opportunities for Privilege Escalation, by way of allowing users to impersonate or assume privileged accounts or permissions via the identities (SANs) associated with a certificate. These abuses may also enable Persistence via stealing or forging certificates that can be used as Valid Accounts for the duration of the certificate's validity, despite user password resets. Authentication certificates can also be stolen and forged for machine accounts. Adversaries who have access to root (or subordinate) CA certificate private keys (or mechanisms protecting/managing these keys) may also establish Persistence by forging arbitrary authentication certificates for the victim domain (known as “golden” certificates). Adversaries may also target certificates and related services in order to access other forms of credentials, such as Golden Ticket ticket-granting tickets (TGT) or NTLM plaintext.

Related

Tactic · MITRE ATT&CK (1)

  • TA0006 Credential Access tactic

Referenced by MITRE ATT&CK · mitigates (4)

  • M1041 Encrypt Sensitive Information mitigation
  • M1042 Disable or Remove Feature or Program mitigation
  • M1047 Audit mitigation
  • M1015 Active Directory Configuration mitigation

Referenced by MITRE ATT&CK · uses (5)

  • G1059 NIMBUS MANTICORE group
  • S9043 Mini Shai-Hulud software (malware)
  • S0677 AADInternals software (tool)
  • G0016 APT29 group
  • S0002 Mimikatz software (tool)

Referenced by Compliance · mitigates (5)

  • CIS-3.11 Encrypt Sensitive Data At Rest CIS Safeguard v8.1
  • CIS-4.8 Uninstall or Disable Unnecessary Services on Enterprise Assets and Software CIS Safeguard v8.1
  • NIST-IA-13 Identity Providers and Authorization Servers NIST 800-53 control
  • NIST-IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) NIST 800-53 control
  • NIST-IA-5 Authenticator Management NIST 800-53 control

References